30pm
Inventor and data analyst Jovan Hutton Pulitzer released a report showing numerous countries interfered in the 2020 election. Pulitzer insists the only solution to see the real winners of the 2020 election at all levels is to forensically audit the ballots.
I don't trust this guy!!! WHY IS HE NOT BANNED EVERYWHERE?
Banning people is a shill tactic and obviously Left ideology. If they don’t agree with me and my echochamber then they are a threat to democracy. Thank you for outing yourself.
Are you Jovan? What in the hell are you talking about? Everyone claiming voter fraud has been purged and yet this guy "hacks the election live" and keeps rambling without pushback. I am talking about JOVAN being banned from talking about election fraud. Take your downvotes back you baboons. REALLY? WHAT HAPPENED TO CRITICAL THINKING? WHY IS HE ALLOWED TO SPEW ELECTION FRAUD?? For those that are still confused, I was asking why is Jovan not banned from EVERYWHERE? I was not talking about OP.
Critical thinking. Don't over do it
I think I understood you, you were being facetious. Not sure why he isn't banned, optics maybe? Don't ban, but bury the report so no one can see it.
You should trust him he’s on your side, and his ability is well established, do your research
I'm just saying this guy dropped right in the middle of it and seems to be spearheading the fraud narrative. I do hope he's cool, but trying to point out that CRITICAL THINKING above hopium will keep us out of the re-education camps.
I (respectfully) disagree with "dropped right in the middle of it". I'd characterize it more of "flying under the radar".
He's been working on it for months, and has been posting his claims in various places. There's just been so much noise that it's hard to track. I saw what I think are his first videos a week or two after the election.
Also, he's a bit on the geeky side, so he's had some "PR issues" regarding communicating his approach (like drowning "Normie" congress-people in minor details), but he's been getting a lot better (especially after the GA Legislator presentation). Plus, most attention was focused on somehow reversing Hammer/Scorecard (via forensic accounting) at the time, whereas by comparison his stuff seemed blaise / mundane. He's also made some presentation mistakes that have allowed Democratic congress people derail him somewhat in questioning.
Also, he's been faced with a complete stonewall of litigation / bullshit, which have really taken the luster off. Election Officials have been doing whatever they can to drag their feet and ignore him.
Technically, I think he's 100% dead-on with his science of "compression chromatography" (or however it's spelled). 100% proof of if a ballot went through the mail, and if a ballot was filled out by a pen or by a printer, and completely detectible from a standard camera ... just needs access to the data that is SUPPOSED to be PUBLIC RECORD according to THE LAW (sorry for caps, it's just fucking infuriating). I haven't read the .pdf yet (trying to download it now...)
And yes, there's a bit of self-aggrandization in his manner, but frankly, that swagger is needed to get these congress-people to trust you.
Point taken. I am not against him by any means, just trying to keep everyone grounded as I am sure some of the people involved will prove to be "planted" to take the investigation "into the woods" and make all the other people that have a genuine point look kooky and discredit them.
Do research on who he is and have faith
Like I saId he has a long well established reputation
What the hell are you talking about? How about I trust Biden or Brennan? They are well established. Muller too. Pelosi looks great and I might even go with Brian Kemp for President. I really don't think I should trust someone just because he's claiming to be on my side? Really poor argument
Your not doing your research
Long established reputation in tech, he is no dummy.
Yes, check Hillary Clinton - long standing political career. Everything she says must be true...