30pm
Inventor and data analyst Jovan Hutton Pulitzer released a report showing numerous countries interfered in the 2020 election. Pulitzer insists the only solution to see the real winners of the 2020 election at all levels is to forensically audit the ballots.
I'm just saying this guy dropped right in the middle of it and seems to be spearheading the fraud narrative. I do hope he's cool, but trying to point out that CRITICAL THINKING above hopium will keep us out of the re-education camps.
I (respectfully) disagree with "dropped right in the middle of it". I'd characterize it more of "flying under the radar".
He's been working on it for months, and has been posting his claims in various places. There's just been so much noise that it's hard to track. I saw what I think are his first videos a week or two after the election.
Also, he's a bit on the geeky side, so he's had some "PR issues" regarding communicating his approach (like drowning "Normie" congress-people in minor details), but he's been getting a lot better (especially after the GA Legislator presentation). Plus, most attention was focused on somehow reversing Hammer/Scorecard (via forensic accounting) at the time, whereas by comparison his stuff seemed blaise / mundane. He's also made some presentation mistakes that have allowed Democratic congress people derail him somewhat in questioning.
Also, he's been faced with a complete stonewall of litigation / bullshit, which have really taken the luster off. Election Officials have been doing whatever they can to drag their feet and ignore him.
Technically, I think he's 100% dead-on with his science of "compression chromatography" (or however it's spelled). 100% proof of if a ballot went through the mail, and if a ballot was filled out by a pen or by a printer, and completely detectible from a standard camera ... just needs access to the data that is SUPPOSED to be PUBLIC RECORD according to THE LAW (sorry for caps, it's just fucking infuriating). I haven't read the .pdf yet (trying to download it now...)
And yes, there's a bit of self-aggrandization in his manner, but frankly, that swagger is needed to get these congress-people to trust you.
Point taken. I am not against him by any means, just trying to keep everyone grounded as I am sure some of the people involved will prove to be "planted" to take the investigation "into the woods" and make all the other people that have a genuine point look kooky and discredit them.
Good point, and I appreciate your caution. But take a look into his science and see if your opinion changes :)
Frankly, I'd love his tech to be further explored/confirmed and adopted widely ... he may not be the answer now, but could be a longer-term improvement to the system, going forward.
Do research on who he is and have faith
Like I saId he has a long well established reputation