My answer to number 1 is pretty simple... it’s hard to imagine using children for blackmail, pedo stuff..., etc... making these politicians or globalist more EVIL than any villain we have ever seen in the movies... even most movies give some sympathy to the villain... was this to desensitize us to the true evil of this world?
For number 2... I have more trouble answering. My general answer is that the Q movement is a couple hundred thousand strong (in the US probably).. so why would the DS care about our “crackpot theories”. I find this reasoning bad though because Q provided many proofs.
What’s your thoughts on 1 and 2?
Here's my 2c.
1 - Child traffickers are real, and their crimes are horrific - no one can deny that. As to whether large numbers of the wealthy and powerful could be conspiratorially hiding crimes of the same degree or worse, there are some people who cannot be convinced because they turn away from the rabbit hole and refuse to believe such things. They will not believe unless they hear it from 'accredited sources', such as MSM, or it is forced in front of their face by stripping away all propaganda. They will not be satisfied until this is all over, and then they will be in shock, and hopefully furious.
2 - The DS is a one trick pony. They have grown lazy and complacent, believing themselves untouchable. They either use distraction or oppression. Even if they reap the benefits of studying the work of the Q Community, they will still develop simple, obvious, and repetitive tactics most of the time.
As I see it, there four ways Q can use the DS qualities and the Q posts and boards to their advantage:
A. Observation. Infiltrate or observe DS via uncompromised individuals in compromised intel agencies, or via technology and cunning that does not require direct infiltration. Being aware of DS maneuvers allows countermoves.
B. Illusion. Leave a path open to the DS. That may have been a major function of the Q posts. If you leave your opponent a subtle path of escape or counterattack, and it appears to be something you are 'trying to keep hidden from them' via riddles or obscure boards, they are less likely to create their own countermoves. Combine that with a bit of 'A' to verify that they are indeed following the obvious path and it is easier to devise a trap.
C. Control. A tactical game like this can be played zoomed in or abstracted out. By implementing a bit of 'B' and 'A' in tandem, Q can create an environment where the DS has a limited number of likely moves. Constantly shifting the pieces and events, such as through the usage of the scaramucci model, creates an urgency, keeping the DS in react mode instead of act mode. When in react mode, the probability of using one of the likely moves increases.
D. Adaptiveness. Even with 'A' through 'C', the DS will pull some surprises. For every move there is a countermove. DJT is a fantastic debater. He is very quick witted and intelligent. You could really see it in how his expression changed when he used Morse code in his latest video (1/12/21). I would have to assume that he is not the only member of Q that is a very capable and flexible tactician - only 3 are not military after all, which means that the majority of Q develops and/or executes tactics all day every day as their occupation.
The DS has no chance, because Q have not only set the board in their favor, but they constantly keep moving the pieces, maintain pressure on the DS to force their hand, and adapt to unforeseen moves from the DS.