Apparently their excuse is that the date and time is set when they start the draft of the story and not when they post it. Further, they say it is because they were writing another story and then had to switch gears when REAL news comes up and the old story's time sticks.
If any of that were true, at what point does an editor look at the bloody thing!?
They are glorified blog posters at best, and at worse they are just copy and pasting CCP-made stories.
This is not an article. It's a page with live updates that was created at 9:22am. The title most likely read "Trump Rally Planned" but later changed the headline. Poor publishing choice, the Headline should be generic "Live updates of January 6th Events in DC"
I'm with you, but we need to focus on the real conspiracies, not created ones
Apparently their excuse is that the date and time is set when they start the draft of the story and not when they post it. Further, they say it is because they were writing another story and then had to switch gears when REAL news comes up and the old story's time sticks.
If any of that were true, at what point does an editor look at the bloody thing!?
They are glorified blog posters at best, and at worse they are just copy and pasting CCP-made stories.
This is not an article. It's a page with live updates that was created at 9:22am. The title most likely read "Trump Rally Planned" but later changed the headline. Poor publishing choice, the Headline should be generic "Live updates of January 6th Events in DC"
I'm with you, but we need to focus on the real conspiracies, not created ones