Sting operation to clean out Big Tech?
Have to wonder at this point.. setting up Parler and being entirely dependent on big tech platforms, while attempting to be a direct competitor? Add in the fact that they had already displayed a categorical tendency to cancel and censor opposition...
With Gab preceeding Parler by a couple of years and already having been canceled for the exact same reasons, you'd have to be pretty dense to approach the same concept with the same business model. Without overcomplicating things this in and of itself might be enough but then we see those 3 year delta drops line up perfectly with mass migration of social media platforms? What does Q teach us about coincidences?
This drop 518 lines up perfectly one day after POTUS social media purge 3 year delta
This Link currently in the Wins sticky sparked my interest
Was Parler a sting OP? It's sole purpose to sue Amazon and Silicon Valley into oblivion? Tbh I cab see it. POTUS and Q have made it excruciatingly obvious that the entire plan follows the confines of the constitution and legal grounds. Painstakingly following every procedure so that they're never implicated crossing the line. How else do you secure the Trillions of dollars in corrupt big tech?
Dan B always was saying they had a plan to take big out big tec
he ran for congress in Maryland but did not win
Astute observation, dude. I keep thinking I can't be amy more amazed or in awe after the latest plot twist/misdirection/snare-trap...and I'm wrong every time.
Pure friggin genius.
I've seen some deep dives into it being a long form pump and dump scam.
All of it's info was apparently hacked right before it went down.
Parler never scrubbed the geolocation info from images, making it real easy to dox people with that hacked info.
Relying on Amazon servers is... well it's what everyone in the world does right now. Server scaling is a royal pain, expensive, high maintenance, while AWS scaling is a couple of button presses and bigger bill.
"Growth Hacking" doesn't work well with an internet site. It takes months, years even, to grow the business at a rate that you can keep up with the server demand. See: all current social media. That is until AWS became a thing, now you can growth hack a startup by leaning on Amazon servers. So, Parler would not have existed without AWS, and their massive astroturfing campaign would have backfired horribly.
Reportedly one of their founding investors is the daughter of a big Trump supporter. I have not seen this verified.
Other conservatives jumped on the bandwagon like they knew something about it: see Bongino.
Other other conservatives didn't trust it from day one because of the inherent sketch of the above details.
Final conclusion: we'll find out before long if it was really a trap door pump and dump or just somewhat mismanaged with a really poor infrastructure. (There is no legitimate reason it should ever have run as slow as it did.)
But maybe it was a white hat trap, idk.
I'm just speculating with some supporting evidence that I've kind of left out of the picture lol, just a thought I wanted to put out there before I moved on, today has been ACTIVE to say the least.
With Gab preceeding Parler by a couple of years and already having been canceled for the exact same reasons, you'd have to be pretty dense to approach the same concept with the same business model. Without overcomplicating things this in and of itself might be enough but then we see those 3 year delta drops line up perfectly with mass migration of social media platforms? What does Q teach us about coincidences?
Edit: adding this to original