I don't know why people have issues with others asking for sources. Particularly, I don't know why you assume that it's only leftists who want sources.
If you want credibility when you make a claim, then you should always provide a source, or at least reason out your logic. There's no reason to be offended when someone asks for a source or for help, because not everyone has the same knowledge base, and by providing sources, you can help others expand their own knowledge base. That's part of what "helping others to prepare" is about, as far as I can tell.
I mean, a good number of leftists probably hold the beliefs that they do because they only have the MSM as their providers of information, and they never had the personal need to look deeper. They shouldn't be snubbed when they ask for or challenge you for a source, because they might actually need some proof put under their nose before they'll question things deeper. If they're being obstinate, and actively ignoring or deriding any proof provided, then that's a different case altogether, but that shouldn't be the assumed default expectation.
Just to clarify, I'm not talking about looking up an outage map. I've just seen this criticism before, and I find it to be counter-productive. I have trouble convincing my family and co-workers of some things, because they've already given up, and were wary of Q to begin with. Being told "you're lazy, do more research" is very ineffective in trying to convince them of anything.
There’s a time and place it’s relevant to demand a source
A fucking outage map isn’t it
Like it or not, effective or not, telling people to go look it up is the correct answer
If we don’t convince people to do their own research they will always believe someone else’s opinion, you people have to learn this is what q tasked anons with
Hot spot on D.C. What a coincidence.
Source? When was this screen shot taken?
Leftists that are too lazy to do research almost always yells SOURCE? Anywho D.C. has cell phone signal blockers in place.
I don't know why people have issues with others asking for sources. Particularly, I don't know why you assume that it's only leftists who want sources.
If you want credibility when you make a claim, then you should always provide a source, or at least reason out your logic. There's no reason to be offended when someone asks for a source or for help, because not everyone has the same knowledge base, and by providing sources, you can help others expand their own knowledge base. That's part of what "helping others to prepare" is about, as far as I can tell.
I mean, a good number of leftists probably hold the beliefs that they do because they only have the MSM as their providers of information, and they never had the personal need to look deeper. They shouldn't be snubbed when they ask for or challenge you for a source, because they might actually need some proof put under their nose before they'll question things deeper. If they're being obstinate, and actively ignoring or deriding any proof provided, then that's a different case altogether, but that shouldn't be the assumed default expectation.
Just to clarify, I'm not talking about looking up an outage map. I've just seen this criticism before, and I find it to be counter-productive. I have trouble convincing my family and co-workers of some things, because they've already given up, and were wary of Q to begin with. Being told "you're lazy, do more research" is very ineffective in trying to convince them of anything.
There’s a time and place it’s relevant to demand a source
A fucking outage map isn’t it
Like it or not, effective or not, telling people to go look it up is the correct answer
If we don’t convince people to do their own research they will always believe someone else’s opinion, you people have to learn this is what q tasked anons with
DYOR