Someone posted earlier today or yesterday (it's all blending together now) about what would happen if all or most of our government got arrested. Someone else responded, well we don't need them anyway.
Which gave me an idea.
Consider the Q movement as a case sample.
Over the past few years, we have become a crowdsourced news station. We are practically a crowdsourced investigation and intelligence team. No one is in charge, because we are all in charge, and it WORKS. (Thanks, mods, I'm not discluding you.)
Perhaps the whole idea of representative government is antiquated, obsolete, vestigial in the time of instant communication and collaboration. Who's to say we couldn't crowdsource a team to draft and read bills, to vote on legislation, to investigate crimes and carry out trials? To organize infrastructure and city planning based on location? And any number of other necessary tasks normally carried out by people who have no idea who we are and what we really want.
Do we really NEED these assholes?
I think we don't.
Yes, I agree with you. I think that's what I was trying to get across. Not to ditch a central government entirely, but to take over some of the things that really COULD be done without them.