I remember a couple small factual errors, as s pizzagate real-time researcher, I noticed. But it us very close to being great red pill. I used it to wake about 25 friends across the country.
I think the Fall of Cabal has way too many factual errors to be worth recommending to anybody. Example, the "boy climbing out of the Buckingham palace window". It wasn't a boy it was a man and it is a hoax video. You can verify for yourself that it is a hoax because the side of the building where the man is climbing doesn't match the architecture of Buckingham Palace. There are other factual problems that I can't remember but that one was so easy to verify in 10-20 minutes of research that it just throws doubt on all the info even if much of it is true.
I know, but in those drops the phrase is in some context. I don’t believe Q saying JFK Jr. is dead is disinformation.
If I turn out to be wrong, great. But right now the JFK Jr. stuff isn’t as important as taking down the primary target and the media uses the JFK Jr. to distract from what we are really about.
Not wanting to argue, but it's my understanding that a Jr. drops the Jr. after the death of Sr. I'm not saying he's alive or dead, but that's why the possibility is plausible to a lot of people. That or maybe he'd have a completely different identity altogether.
It turns off normies. If you have someone who is already slightly pilled then the jfk stuff is fine. But it’s better not give them something that would cause them to dismiss all the info because of one piece of the puzzle. Also the jfk jr stuff isn’t pertinent. It would be a great sweetener but the posts are what’s important.
I remember a couple small factual errors, as s pizzagate real-time researcher, I noticed. But it us very close to being great red pill. I used it to wake about 25 friends across the country.
I think the Fall of Cabal has way too many factual errors to be worth recommending to anybody. Example, the "boy climbing out of the Buckingham palace window". It wasn't a boy it was a man and it is a hoax video. You can verify for yourself that it is a hoax because the side of the building where the man is climbing doesn't match the architecture of Buckingham Palace. There are other factual problems that I can't remember but that one was so easy to verify in 10-20 minutes of research that it just throws doubt on all the info even if much of it is true.
https://greatawakening.win/p/11S0SPWgQm/the-sequel-to-the-fall-of-the-ca/c/
Go with the mouthy Buddha vids. They’re a good entry point.
My wife showed me the videos and they are very informative.
awesome
They need to drop the JFK Jr. crap. Rest of it is OK... a couple of errors but nothing major.
Q said JFK Jr. is dead.
I know, but in those drops the phrase is in some context. I don’t believe Q saying JFK Jr. is dead is disinformation.
If I turn out to be wrong, great. But right now the JFK Jr. stuff isn’t as important as taking down the primary target and the media uses the JFK Jr. to distract from what we are really about.
Not wanting to argue, but it's my understanding that a Jr. drops the Jr. after the death of Sr. I'm not saying he's alive or dead, but that's why the possibility is plausible to a lot of people. That or maybe he'd have a completely different identity altogether.
I won’t argue with any of that, but until I see more evidence, I am content to believe Q was being truthful and he meant the real JFK Jr.
It turns off normies. If you have someone who is already slightly pilled then the jfk stuff is fine. But it’s better not give them something that would cause them to dismiss all the info because of one piece of the puzzle. Also the jfk jr stuff isn’t pertinent. It would be a great sweetener but the posts are what’s important.