You are misunderstanding. I didn't need to research because I was on the research board when these happened.
At lot was going down at that point and I'd be refreshing Trumps Twitter to see if he was saying anything interesting and refreshing the Q boards and aggregators in separate tabs. Aggregators took longer to show them than the board itself as Q would crosspost to the board before the aggregators picked it up, and some were slower than others. The posts were always on his own board and cross posted to the research one. So when his post dropped into the convo we'd go check his board to see if it was there. Occasionally it wasn't - but if you were quick you'd see it (people screen capped them before he'd deleted it). Guess he changed his mind at that point about revealing something. Happened a few times over the years This was another way we knew if Q post was genuine (aside from the darker tripcode which people tried to spoof)
There was discussion on the board at the time these coincidences happened. There was always someone who said 'it doesn't show that time in my browser' but browser time depends on where you are.
I'm in the U.K. and like most on the chans do not log in or post, so the time on the boards was always server time. Those of us who were watching in real time didn't need to piss around with trying to match 'times' we witnessed it.
Q would post but Trump hadn't yet tweeted. Constant refreshing the tab to catch Trumps tweets showed him posting shortly after - sometimes within a couple of minutes.
That was precisely WHY he kept talking about mathematical probabilities between his posts and Trumps when the Anons started NOTICING it.
I never said the aggregators had different time, I said when people watch live and take a screencap from the board the time shows server time as it was showing ON THE BOARD.
Aggregators are just that and all show the board time, some pick up the posts slower than others (they are just feeds after all) but they still show the time as was posted on the board.
I will repeat AGAIN for the slowwitted out there... many of us were on the board AT THE TIME these posts happened. Q posted, Trump had not. Then Trump posted and the 'coincidence' was discussed and it happened frequently and that is how it all became a 'delta'. Q then talked about it the probability and henceforth we paid attention to when and what Trump posted after a Q post..
Do not try and tell me what I and others witnessed in real time didn't happen because you who weren't there can't get your head around it.
You are missing the point focusing on one tweet. There were DOZENS of them over 4 years. Q posted and a short time later Trump would tweet. It was like clockwork.
You are misunderstanding. I didn't need to research because I was on the research board when these happened.
At lot was going down at that point and I'd be refreshing Trumps Twitter to see if he was saying anything interesting and refreshing the Q boards and aggregators in separate tabs. Aggregators took longer to show them than the board itself as Q would crosspost to the board before the aggregators picked it up, and some were slower than others. The posts were always on his own board and cross posted to the research one. So when his post dropped into the convo we'd go check his board to see if it was there. Occasionally it wasn't - but if you were quick you'd see it (people screen capped them before he'd deleted it). Guess he changed his mind at that point about revealing something. Happened a few times over the years This was another way we knew if Q post was genuine (aside from the darker tripcode which people tried to spoof)
There was discussion on the board at the time these coincidences happened. There was always someone who said 'it doesn't show that time in my browser' but browser time depends on where you are.
I'm in the U.K. and like most on the chans do not log in or post, so the time on the boards was always server time. Those of us who were watching in real time didn't need to piss around with trying to match 'times' we witnessed it.
Q would post but Trump hadn't yet tweeted. Constant refreshing the tab to catch Trumps tweets showed him posting shortly after - sometimes within a couple of minutes.
That was precisely WHY he kept talking about mathematical probabilities between his posts and Trumps when the Anons started NOTICING it.
But hey, you do you.
I never said the aggregators had different time, I said when people watch live and take a screencap from the board the time shows server time as it was showing ON THE BOARD.
Aggregators are just that and all show the board time, some pick up the posts slower than others (they are just feeds after all) but they still show the time as was posted on the board.
I will repeat AGAIN for the slowwitted out there... many of us were on the board AT THE TIME these posts happened. Q posted, Trump had not. Then Trump posted and the 'coincidence' was discussed and it happened frequently and that is how it all became a 'delta'. Q then talked about it the probability and henceforth we paid attention to when and what Trump posted after a Q post..
Do not try and tell me what I and others witnessed in real time didn't happen because you who weren't there can't get your head around it.
You are missing the point focusing on one tweet. There were DOZENS of them over 4 years. Q posted and a short time later Trump would tweet. It was like clockwork.
That is WHY it became a 'thing'.