Thomas Wictor can be interesting when he discusses history, but when he discusses current events he often argues based on a false reality. He accepts falsehoods as fact. And if you call him up on it, he throws a hissy fit.

I remember a few years ago he did a thread on why Seymour Hersh was wrong to claim that the DNC murdered Seth Rich. The only problem was Seymour Hersh never claimed that. In fact Hersh literally said, "I don't think he was murdered because of what he knew."

Now Seymour Hersh may or may be wrong - that's not my point - the point is that Wictor attributed a false claim to Seymour Hersh, then argued against that false claim which Hersh never made in the first place. If Wictor had bothered to listen to the Seymour Hersh audio, he would have realized he was arguing over a false reality.