Trying to be objective, although I’m not. Atty by trade but not expert on this subject matter by any means! Here are the things in my mind that weigh in favor for both possible courses of action (nothing vs military actions). Obviously we have gone too far for any court action to prevent inauguration.
Bad
- we don’t know of any arrests yet.
- alleged that Kamala resigns senate seat on Monday.
- more talk of ‘Biden administration’ from trump cabinet, other presumed trump supporters.
- more resignations of trump cabinet supporters
Good
- dni report. Although we haven’t seen it. Gotta be something there based on 3-page Ratliffe report.
- massive military presence in Dc and other troop actions around the country.
- fbi and cia reluctantly announcing Iran election interference (at least something outside of dni report)
- false flag riot arrests.....at least antifa and BLM publicly acknowledged. More justification for military action.
- all the beefing up in gitmo over past two years certainly has to be for something. Does not add up to beef up gitmo while withdrawing troops around the world.
- what about swawell and the Chinese honeypot? Shouldn’t that give pause to the military?
- all the Ukraine reports and Obamagate declass. I agree that any active investigations would not be declassified without arrests. (But if nobody is going to do shit about it, maybe so?)
What else points to military action?
Might I add the Death of Baron Benjamin Rothschild to the Good List!
Biden talk is for optics, and Trump is clearing his cabinet he needs to make a new one with people that are loyal to the Constitution.
FEMA and DEFSEC Miller
My husband will not understand that Biden has no control over the military. He keeps telling me that the president elect is important too and because they want to transition power, if Biden requests more military than he can have it. i literally made an entire post that was stacked about who is in control of the NG and military in washington DC and showed it to him and he says he doesn't believe it. I'm obviously a supporter of Q and he's a die hard trump fan and a very passionate conservative republican. Without q bias, does he have any merit to his claim? i can't seem to find anything outside MSM that says a president elect can request military presence.
At this very moment, Sleepy Joe is a private citizen. Until he takes a VALID oath, he’s no different than your neighbor Bob.
He can call himself anything he wants, but he absolutely zero power.
Right now, Biden has as much "power" to call in military as any of us (normal citizens) do.
No, from my understanding the president elect has ZERO power over the military whatsoever. Any historical info to the contrary is simply ‘tradition’ or ‘courtesy’ Like Lin wood says, “we have one president at a time and right now Donald Trump is our president”
One other thing I just thought of that makes me feel more confident in the storm is this:
You are a Police officer in Anytown, USA, working your normal patrol shift across from the bank and slated to retire in 24 hours. Two masked democrats rob the bank and start riding away on stolen bicycles. You are still going to perform your duty and arrest them despite the fact that you are retiring in 24 hours.
And
The football game isn’t over at the 2 minute warning.
Fraud vitiates everything
Chris Miller ordering NSA to replace the head attorney 4 days before the inauguration
This seems really really big.
Agreed. Sounds like they are preparing for military tribunals....
The best sign is Trump's EOs, doesn't feel at all like someone who's leaving.
You’re right! How did I forget that. And what with Miller ordering nsa to appoint trump friendly atty to their lead atty? That is all about declassification I would presume.
Don't forget the Q posts coming true like post 4414 - the 'operational plan' Red 1,2,3 etc.