I get that you’re saying the JCOS should have knowledge and allegiance to Trump, but again, according to Q, only 9 people have the full picture, and 3 aren’t military. That leaves 6 in the military who know what’s actually going on. They’re probably not the JCOS.
Here’s another note directly from wiki:
After the 1986 reorganization of the Armed Forces undertaken by the Goldwater–Nichols Act, the Joint Chiefs of Staff does not possess operational authority over troops or other units. Responsibility for conducting military operations goes from the president to the secretary of defense directly to the commanders of the unified combatant commands and thus bypasses the Joint Chiefs of Staff completely.
If Trump thought he could change DC from within, I would say that’s a fatal mistake. And that he never should of even tried.
But if he approached it with Q’s notions, military is the only way. Then there’s hope.
I get that you’re saying the JCOS should have knowledge and allegiance to Trump, but again, according to Q, only 9 people have the full picture, and 3 aren’t military. That leaves 6 in the military who know what’s actually going on. They’re probably not the JCOS.
Here’s another note directly from wiki:
After the 1986 reorganization of the Armed Forces undertaken by the Goldwater–Nichols Act, the Joint Chiefs of Staff does not possess operational authority over troops or other units. Responsibility for conducting military operations goes from the president to the secretary of defense directly to the commanders of the unified combatant commands and thus bypasses the Joint Chiefs of Staff completely.
Even if they are briefed, they could be grandstanding, pro-establishment.
Aren’t they advisors and still under the command of the President, Secretary of Defense, and NSC?