So what happens when Biden is sworn in and is informed that secretly martial law was declared and that he's not allowed to do anything? The only way to legally remove a sitting president is impeachment. Q has repeatedly indicated that it is desirable that things are done "by the book" in order to preserve the sanctity of the legal system.
If you don't want the public to think there is a coup, you present the evidence that these people are who you are accusing them of being. You think that "we've just arrested everyone including your new president and now we're in control -- Chris Miller" is going to be easier for the sheep to swallow?
Biden being allowed to publicly pretend to be president (and what of the decisions that he makes? Who is going to tell him he's not allowed to make any decisions? You reckon anyone will notice?) for a couple weeks is not part of the plan. It does not make sense.
The only reason I disagree, is because a Trump's term doesn't extend beyond the 20th, regardless. Either he's sworn in for another term or not or military command comes in
Biden, sworn in, can undo Trump's EOs. If he's sworn in, ceremonially and executes presidential office (which he would in the first 10 days or week whatever) he is president. There is no take backsies.
IMO, people like Juan and BARD are pushing the envelope to try and encourage their audience to stay with them. If the 20th happens, their audience goes. They don't want that.
The only *unless that applies is unless there is a declaration of war, however, again, the swearing in is a problem. A big problem. The military would have to take over either before or straight after. It doesn't jive with law to allow it to go ahead.
Biden could call in UN troops if that were to happen after the fact of swearing in.
They'd be seen as a military insurrection then.
I just listened to part of Bard FM's video and dude... he thinks Merkel "resigned".
Merkel didn't snap resign. She didn't resign. She's not seeking RE-ELECTION.
This was set in motion in 2018.
I'm sorry but this dude talks the talk, but he doesn't walk the walk. If he's wrong about something so simple like Merkel... he's not doing due diligence in his research.
lol he literally just said "DETAILS MATTER PATRIOTS". Yes! They do!
I would say he does. It would be autistic to play it now though. It has to be a natural progression. Sending in the troops when he did was prepping the public, imo.
I believe the military will wait a week and then publically announce martial law because of the Democrat coup.
Ehh I'm drawing the line at inauguration, anything beyond that sounds like wishful goalpost moving.
That logic could be stretched to something to the tune of 'the military needs one term to gather more evidence for tribunals and secure public opinion by showing how bad things will be under commy control'.
Plus it would be easy to manufacture 'strange events/coincidences' that seem to point to a potential happenings once one gets the amount of control the Uniparty will potentially have if they succeed in rigging gaffmaster general in to office.
So what happens when Biden is sworn in and is informed that secretly martial law was declared and that he's not allowed to do anything? The only way to legally remove a sitting president is impeachment. Q has repeatedly indicated that it is desirable that things are done "by the book" in order to preserve the sanctity of the legal system.
If you don't want the public to think there is a coup, you present the evidence that these people are who you are accusing them of being. You think that "we've just arrested everyone including your new president and now we're in control -- Chris Miller" is going to be easier for the sheep to swallow?
Biden being allowed to publicly pretend to be president (and what of the decisions that he makes? Who is going to tell him he's not allowed to make any decisions? You reckon anyone will notice?) for a couple weeks is not part of the plan. It does not make sense.
The only reason I disagree, is because a Trump's term doesn't extend beyond the 20th, regardless. Either he's sworn in for another term or not or military command comes in
Biden, sworn in, can undo Trump's EOs. If he's sworn in, ceremonially and executes presidential office (which he would in the first 10 days or week whatever) he is president. There is no take backsies.
IMO, people like Juan and BARD are pushing the envelope to try and encourage their audience to stay with them. If the 20th happens, their audience goes. They don't want that.
The only *unless that applies is unless there is a declaration of war, however, again, the swearing in is a problem. A big problem. The military would have to take over either before or straight after. It doesn't jive with law to allow it to go ahead.
Biden could call in UN troops if that were to happen after the fact of swearing in. They'd be seen as a military insurrection then.
I just listened to part of Bard FM's video and dude... he thinks Merkel "resigned". Merkel didn't snap resign. She didn't resign. She's not seeking RE-ELECTION.
This was set in motion in 2018.
I'm sorry but this dude talks the talk, but he doesn't walk the walk. If he's wrong about something so simple like Merkel... he's not doing due diligence in his research.
lol he literally just said "DETAILS MATTER PATRIOTS". Yes! They do!
I would say he does. It would be autistic to play it now though. It has to be a natural progression. Sending in the troops when he did was prepping the public, imo.
I think this is possibility.
The inurgeration goes ahead only for troops to remain in the Capitol.
Even if Ttp is removed im not calling quits on it until Miller and the rest are gone.
I like the sound of that word you just invented. May I borrow it? :-)
Yeah.
It doesn't matter how you spell it because its fake any way, might as well give it a fake name.
Ehh I'm drawing the line at inauguration, anything beyond that sounds like wishful goalpost moving.
That logic could be stretched to something to the tune of 'the military needs one term to gather more evidence for tribunals and secure public opinion by showing how bad things will be under commy control'.
Plus it would be easy to manufacture 'strange events/coincidences' that seem to point to a potential happenings once one gets the amount of control the Uniparty will potentially have if they succeed in rigging gaffmaster general in to office.