Consider the source, CNET. That's why it's not the title I find disturbing, or their mistaken attempt at journalism, but rather the blazen openness.
Unfortunately, the left often refers to Q as QAnon and is attempting to further demonize, censor and ban anything resembling Q. Sorta like how they call AR-15s fully semiautomatic assault rifles and want them banned, guilty by association.
How silly. Removing swag of something that doesn't exist. Q exists. Anons exist. There is no QAnon. Per Q.
Turn it back on them say you're the Q in LGBTQXIASLPED
Removing Q from amazon is anti homosex. Not allowed!
lol
Spouseanon said the same thing!! ?
Consider the source, CNET. That's why it's not the title I find disturbing, or their mistaken attempt at journalism, but rather the blazen openness.
Unfortunately, the left often refers to Q as QAnon and is attempting to further demonize, censor and ban anything resembling Q. Sorta like how they call AR-15s fully semiautomatic assault rifles and want them banned, guilty by association.