I'm not saying you can't have free speech. You can say Don lost all you want. I won't track you down and ban you across forums; I won't dox you, or your family for what you say.
Part of free speech is knowing that it doesn't override other people's freedoms. If you came in here with immense vulgarity, should I not deport/report you then as well?
As a business, the .win's have rules on their forums. If those rules are not followed or enforced they only serve to hurt those seeking to do good, whilst benefiting those that do harm.
You may say, "Social media banning Trump and others is enforcement of their rules; they are private companies, and they are exercising their rights" and you'd be slightly correct. The major difference, here, however, is that those companies are colluding and monopolizing the market. They are, in the opinion of myself (and many others), in illegal standing; and, as they are monopolizing public forum, either they aught to be broken up, or they must be treated as a public entity where they must respect freedom of speech laws. What's more, those forums don't just stop at banning people. They [or the users of those forums that appear to have the corporate support] attempt to and endorse doxxing, internet-wide bans, making lists of people, and blacklisting people from jobs. That is violations of multiple freedoms, and well overreaches allotted business rights. I am seeking none of those here.
The other major reason that this situation is different from those is that those companies are obligated to set and enforce a specific public company policy. They must attempt to justly and equally apply those rules to all people, no special exceptions to the rules unless the rules themselves clarify those rules.
When Trump was banned from twitter, they cited that he violated their policy by "encouraging violence". The video he had posted (that they took down prior as well) to being banned explicitly told people to go home and NOT engage in acts of violence. Trump has repeatedly denounced violence; this is why you see so many on this forum doing the same. Therefore, they did not apply their rules to him equally to other people, in particular certain politicians on the other side of the fence that called for "shooting the rioters" or "shooting the protestors" or sending them all to "reeducation camps" or the likes. Until they enforce their policy fairly and properly, they are in a state of prejudice and violating people's freedom of speech.
On this forum, the rules are typically applied equally and justly. I deported your post for multiple reasons; for one, I suspected you were a bot (really; who names themselves "Not a bot" and talks opposite of what a Q supporter would likely say. Finally, the account appears borderline brand new, and has done nothing but spout the same kind of "he lost" talk, which makes it look even more like a bot (and is pretty low-effort)
Are you politically left-wing? It seems like it just from your post history, but I may be wrong. Just curious.
I'm not saying you can't have free speech. You can say Don lost all you want. I won't track you down and ban you across forums; I won't dox you, or your family for what you say.
Part of free speech is knowing that it doesn't override other people's freedoms. If you came in here with immense vulgarity, should I not deport/report you then as well?
As a business, the .win's have rules on their forums. If those rules are not followed or enforced they only serve to hurt those seeking to do good, whilst benefiting those that do harm.
You may say, "Social media banning Trump and others is enforcement of their rules; they are private companies, and they are exercising their rights" and you'd be slightly correct. The major difference, here, however, is that those companies are colluding and monopolizing the market. They are, in the opinion of myself (and many others), in illegal standing; and, as they are monopolizing public forum, either they aught to be broken up, or they must be treated as a public entity where they must respect freedom of speech laws. What's more, those forums don't just stop at banning people. They [or the users of those forums that appear to have the corporate support] attempt to and endorse doxxing, internet-wide bans, making lists of people, and blacklisting people from jobs. That is violations of multiple freedoms, and well overreaches allotted business rights. I am seeking none of those here.
The other major reason that this situation is different from those is that those companies are obligated to set and enforce a specific public company policy. They must attempt to justly and equally apply those rules to all people, no special exceptions to the rules unless the rules themselves clarify those rules.
When Trump was banned from twitter, they cited that he violated their policy by "encouraging violence". The video he had posted (that they took down prior as well) to being banned explicitly told people to go home and NOT engage in acts of violence. Trump has repeatedly denounced violence; this is why you see so many on this forum doing the same. Therefore, they did not apply their rules to him equally to other people, in particular certain politicians on the other side of the fence that called for "shooting the rioters" or "shooting the protestors" or sending them all to "reeducation camps" or the likes. Until they enforce their policy fairly and properly, they are in a state of prejudice and violating people's freedom of speech.
On this forum, the rules are typically applied equally and justly. I deported your post for multiple reasons; for one, I suspected you were a bot (really; who names themselves "Not a bot" and talks opposite of what a Q supporter would likely say. Finally, the account appears borderline brand new, and has done nothing but spout the same kind of "he lost" talk, which makes it look even more like a bot (and is pretty low-effort)
Are you politically left-wing? It seems like it just from your post history, but I may be wrong. Just curious.