Because it's undefined what he means and discussion worthy. Are we not discussing things anymore, and instead just sheep being tossed our allowed rations. Do you not want to discuss this clip. What is your issue with the clip being shown?
I posted the lead-in that came attached to the video, unaltered.
I immediately posted in a comment below the video I thought he had said 'of'. I then later deleted as I expanded the thought in a new reply so that I did not have two repeating thoughts expressed. I did it fine....perhaps not spectacularly, but I immediately got my opinion out and did not delete my oversimplified reply until I had gone back and listened several more times. What do you want? Really? Do you feel you are magnifying MAGA at this point, or are you just being a dick.
I work in a grade school and I swear, I see your attitude half a dozen times every recess.
Okay....which part of the title is wrong? I posted The Title, as it was shown on twatter, only adding in the name of the general.
Do you feel I should have reworded the originators post? Did the poor semantics [not mine] get to you so that you felt a need to flagellate the messenger?
These are intense days, and I feel it too. This is my final reply to you - let it go.
Everyone calm down. Either of or to, it does not matter. Of, is better in my opinion because who has the military power been transferred to already? POTUS, Miller, etc. Look at the letter from Pelosi freaking out... Logic, breath, listen.
Twatter is exploding with was it 'of,' or was it 'to'. I heard 'of'.
I agree, the difference is huge, but it could still be a transfer of power to the military...intentionally ambiguous.
Doesn't matter ' of or to, president is always in control of the military, there is NEVER a"peaceful transition to MILITARY power, UNLESS, THE INSURRECTION ACT HAD BEEN INVOKED.
I saw this and it struck me as not normal at all, glad someone posted this. "a peaceful transition of military power"(never mind saying "to"). Also notice how he struggles just before saying the 5 words in question, it's like he's really having to think about it to use the correct words...So does this infer that there are different factions within the military, some pro-Trump some other?
OF.
So what does OF mean. What does that mean for us
OF. Not TO.
its not ambiguous at all, he said OF
yeah...I heard 'of'.
Then why'd you post this?
Because it's undefined what he means and discussion worthy. Are we not discussing things anymore, and instead just sheep being tossed our allowed rations. Do you not want to discuss this clip. What is your issue with the clip being shown?
I posted the lead-in that came attached to the video, unaltered. I immediately posted in a comment below the video I thought he had said 'of'. I then later deleted as I expanded the thought in a new reply so that I did not have two repeating thoughts expressed. I did it fine....perhaps not spectacularly, but I immediately got my opinion out and did not delete my oversimplified reply until I had gone back and listened several more times. What do you want? Really? Do you feel you are magnifying MAGA at this point, or are you just being a dick. I work in a grade school and I swear, I see your attitude half a dozen times every recess.
Okay....which part of the title is wrong? I posted The Title, as it was shown on twatter, only adding in the name of the general.
Do you feel I should have reworded the originators post? Did the poor semantics [not mine] get to you so that you felt a need to flagellate the messenger?
These are intense days, and I feel it too. This is my final reply to you - let it go.
Everyone calm down. Either of or to, it does not matter. Of, is better in my opinion because who has the military power been transferred to already? POTUS, Miller, etc. Look at the letter from Pelosi freaking out... Logic, breath, listen.
Twatter is exploding with was it 'of,' or was it 'to'. I heard 'of'. I agree, the difference is huge, but it could still be a transfer of power to the military...intentionally ambiguous.
Sounds like he just misspoke, but I'm hoping it's true. Notice how Georgie Boy didn't seem to notice.
Holy shit!
Doesn't matter ' of or to, president is always in control of the military, there is NEVER a"peaceful transition to MILITARY power, UNLESS, THE INSURRECTION ACT HAD BEEN INVOKED.
I heard to, not of. If anything there wasn't a word and he just said peaceful transition military power
He said o' which is of.
I clear as day heard to.
It's like that color dress all over again
General mush mouth said OF not TO.
I saw this and it struck me as not normal at all, glad someone posted this. "a peaceful transition of military power"(never mind saying "to"). Also notice how he struggles just before saying the 5 words in question, it's like he's really having to think about it to use the correct words...So does this infer that there are different factions within the military, some pro-Trump some other?
The transfer OF military power (TO...?).
MISINFO u/katrina241 DELETE THIS POST