2
TrumpTrollMaster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wait for the country to fall apart.

The military will step in when all hope is lost.

There will be a lot of blood.

Listen carefully.

https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZE4aE3ef/trump-explains-why-it-had-to-be-/c/

18
TrumpTrollMaster 18 points ago +18 / -0

Go for a walk. Say nothing. Just wait until he says something and listen.

2
TrumpTrollMaster 2 points ago +2 / -0

This will be put down brutally and swiftly. This is why you need the second amendment.

3
TrumpTrollMaster 3 points ago +3 / -0

Definitely not. He is not a part of the Q movement.

1
TrumpTrollMaster 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Tanakh includes the bible. Are they going to hell?

You cannot simultaneously claim Christianity is the only possible faith while denouncing the faith from which Christianity arose.

You cannot claim God to be all loving while saying God won't love you if you aren't a Christian but follow God in another way

You cannot claim God to be to beyond human understanding while presuming Christianity to be the only way to interpret God.

Your argument isn't just flawed, it's contradictory and asinine

I don't have a problem with the Christian faith. Your relationship with God is your right and choosing. But if you deny my relationship with God just because I'm not a Christian, then you're not being a good Christian because you think God doesn't care and anthropomorphized God.

1
TrumpTrollMaster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Either God is beyond human understanding or is a man-made construct. Which one are you advocating?

If former, you cannot impose Christianity on others because you have no idea how God works.

If latter, God becomes an interpretation and not all knowing, and therefore Christianity is flawed.

You're making a poor case for Christianity.

1
TrumpTrollMaster 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not the one anthropomorphizing God and then claiming he's beyond human understanding.

2
TrumpTrollMaster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Almost all of my attractive female friends are conservatives. All of them. I don't mean just physically, I mean personality wise too.

88
TrumpTrollMaster 88 points ago +89 / -1

I used to think people who said vax caused autism were nutjobs.

Boy has these last few years made me reevaluate that stance.

1
TrumpTrollMaster 1 point ago +2 / -1

I believe in God but I don't believe in Christ, because I was born on a continent in a country that doesn't start with Christianity as state religion.

Daoism does not see God as an entity but as a force of nature. It doesn't teach you to find assurance, but to find peace. You and I face the same enemy, have the same principles, but we came from different paths. Does that mean I subscribe to a different religion and therefore have to go to hell?

I'm not here preaching my religion because that's not the point. I subscribe to a philosophical belief that God is very real and exists, and everything will work out in the end (as dictated by Daoism). But one should be able to find God in their own way without being judged or pigeon-holed by one set of written work.

2
TrumpTrollMaster 2 points ago +2 / -0

"I'm not equipped for this"?

YOU freely interpret God. Then you say other people who interpret God differently are not equipped.

You're right. I'm not prepared to believe God is understandable by man in any capacity and will stick with Daoism. I'm not going to THEN claim God wants everyone want to be Daoist and try to make that the dominant religion while preaching God is incomprehensible.

1
TrumpTrollMaster 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you agree that God transcends human perception, yet you claim he wants everyone to be Christian?

Are you listening to yourself?

2
TrumpTrollMaster 2 points ago +2 / -0

"You create your own system of man-made rules and moral authority, and then you force God to fit into it against and in the face of God being the supreme moral law giver as revealed in the Word of God. So, in that sense you are making God more like a human (human characterization of God), when in reality He transcends what you perceive Him and obligate Him to be."

Meanwhile, I'm the one arguing that trying to pigeon hole everyone into one religion by being the moral authority on religions seems really strawman.

Projection much?

1
TrumpTrollMaster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Christianity isn't the only way to God. The Holy Bible and Daoism reach the same destination in different paths - that we should love each other and care for fellow man. I just prefer to interpret God as not comprehensible by men in entirety and not anthropomorphize him to be an entity with wrathful intentions of converting everyone to Christianity while dooming every other kind spirit to hell.

1
TrumpTrollMaster 1 point ago +1 / -0

"We are incapable of determining what God is required to do or not do. The reason is, we are His creation and He is our Creator. He is also the author of morality. Therefore, we do not create systems of rules for which we obligate God to fit into or not and then determine or conclude He is loving or not. Scripture speaks to all people who are born in environments of various religions and exposure to (or lack thereof) the gospel:"

Yet Christianity is the only way to subscribe to God?

So YOU anthropomorphize God, say that the only way to God is Christianity, discredit all other ways of reaching God, and then say we can't figure out what God wants to do?

You're free to worship God in anyway you choose. I don't have a problem with Christianity, but your argument is poor.

view more: Next ›