As much as I hate to say it, but I am with you. Just 2 key points that make me think this is fake or someone who is so poorly informed is offering "facts" and we're supposed to go along.
RE: Its in the Constitution, A20, that POTUS term ends at NOON of Jan. 20. No way around it, don't care who this "source" is, but he is certainly very confused on that. Contested election, or not. And how and when, and who really made "contested election" a fact, BY LAW? Courts never enabled that, Commiegress refused to go along. SCOTUS case is to be heard next week sometime? I call BS.
RE: "Negotiations..." Didn't Q say, NO DEALS? Negotiations means that some, if not most, of the enemies escape real punishment. And I am not buying this crap, no point in getting to this point to only face it again in 4 years. I call BS.
I'll read through more, and give it more thought, but so far, as well as it is informative to a point, not buying into the notion that answers are coming from someone well informed on the matters and proceedings. I could give you better answers and I am in no way claiming that I am "having access" to anyone of value.
Just an analysis from where I sit. Way too many shills running around lately claiming "access".
As much as I hate to say it, but I am with you. Just 2 key points that make me think this is fake or someone who is so poorly informed is offering "facts" and we're supposed to go along.
RE: Its in the Constitution, A20, that POTUS term ends at NOON of Jan. 20. No way around it, don't care who this "source" is, but he is certainly very confused on that. Contested election, or not. And how and when, and who really made "contested election" a fact, BY LAW? Courts never enabled that, Commiegress refused to go along. SCOTUS case is to be heard next week sometime? I call BS.
RE: "Negotiations..." Didn't Q say, NO DEALS? Negotiations means that some, if not most, of the enemies escape real punishment. And I am not buying this crap, no point in getting to this point to only face it again in 4 years. I call BS.
I'll read through more, and give it more thought, but so far, as well as it is informative to a point, not buying into the notion that answers are coming from someone well informed on the matters and proceedings. I could give you better answers and I am in no way claiming that I am "having access" to anyone of value.
Just an analysis from where I sit. Way too many shills running around lately claiming "access".