The military occupation has already happened.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
I dunno. I have a feeling that military occupation refers to occupation of non US soil.
On US soil, it has to be martial law, no?
Presence of US military on US soil does not mean military occupation. It means they are on hand if and when martial law is declared.
change my mind?
35 A State’s military forces controlling its own territory would not be regarded as conducting an occupation; similarly, foreign forces conducting operations with the consent of the territorial State would also not be regarded as conducting an occupation.36 However, the law of belligerent occupation may be applicable to a non-international armed conflict when a non-State party to the conflict has been recognized as a belligerent.