Sauce
THE GOLDEN RULE OF NEGOTIATING AND SUCCESS: HE WHO HAS THE GOLD MAKES THE RULES. THANK YOU!
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114372102982066647
April 21, 2025
Scwab's departure was announced at least a few weeks back, so its no real surprise, but the timing is ..... nice.
Reportedly, Schwab was a protege of Kissinger. He went to Harvard. Harvard, whose federal funding Donald J. Trump just froze.
Good time to be alive.
Do you realize that the scripture has given us a perfect example of "second coming", verified by Jesus himself? This is something that theologians have ignored or misunderstood for millennia. Why? Because, as Paul explained, "now we see dimly....".
Jesus himself emphasized this point: "I have many things to say to you, but you are not able to bear them now." (john 16:12) and "I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?" (John 3:12)
The Scripture is like the Q board. There are/were many things in the Q drops we did not and could not understand at the time. Only in the future, as things have unfolded (and are still unfolding) can we understand them.
With the scripture, there are many, many things that need to be put together and only in the big picture make sense.
Part of the problem is the limitations of our understanding because Jesus was taken from us so prematurely. Compared to anything else, the Gospel is the light of truth in a dark world, but it leaves many gaps. Not because God is not perfect, but because his instruments are imperfect, and have been imperfect from the day Jesus departed the earth. Jesus has only been able to teach us via imperfect people who imperfectly understand.
So, can I suggest you try to spot the example of "second coming" in the Bible. It's right there, in front of us. What we need to understand is how and why second coming works. How the spirit interacts with the flesh, and why the flesh is necessary for the spirit to grow.
If you cannot spot the example, then let me know, and we'll continue the conversation.
btw, I appreciate your straight forward comments and responses. Such dialog is how we move forward, imo.
Once Jesus made the offering and claimed the spiritual victory through the crucifixion course, he began a new providence completely. The 2000 years from Abraham to Jesus were to prepare a foundation for Jesus to be accepted and obeyed on the national level, by a nation of people. That's the meaning of the 'chosen people'.
But they failed, and in doing so, lost their position.
(“A man planted a vineyard. He put a wall around it, dug a wine vat, and built a watchtower. Then he rented it out to some tenants and went away on a journey. At harvest time, he sent a servant to the tenants to collect his share of the fruit of the vineyard. But they seized the servant, beat him, and sent him away empty-handed. Then he sent them another servant, and they struck him over the head and treated him shamefully. He sent still another, and this one they killed. He sent many others; some they beat and others they killed. Finally, having one beloved son, he sent him to them. ‘They will respect my son,’ he said.
"But the tenants said to one another, ‘This is the heir. Come, let us kill him, and the inheritance will be ours.’ So they seized the son, killed him, and threw him out of the vineyard. What then will the owner of the vineyard do? He will come and kill those tenants, and will give the vineyard to others.")
A new providence then began, centering on Christianity, whose fundamental premise is unity with Jesus Christ. After the 3-day crucifixion course, Jesus worked on Earth for 40 days to begin this providence, to lay a foundation of the worldwide level, not just national.
Many then united with him, but not as the Israelite nation, but now as Christians, which are the second Israel.
God's providence works in a precise manner, but a key factor always is the human aspect of responsibility. If humans unite with God, his will for that moment is accomplished. If they reject God and have faithlessnes, then God's purpose is prolonged.
This is why, for example, Moses did a 40-day fast, and why the Israelites wandered in the desert for 40 years. Moses was responsible for raising Israel to the national level on the foundation of the victory of Abraham-Isaac-Jacob. Once Israel arrived in the promised land, then God worked with them leading them to build a foundation where one nation could unite with Christ when he arrived.
When that collapsed, not through God or Jesus failure in any way, but through the collective faithlessness of Israel, God began a new providence wherein a new foundation was being constructed centering on the resurrected Jesus. This is why Christianity is a worldwide religion, and the center of all religious accomplishment. What for? To prepare the foundation so that when Christ returns, the world, as a whole, will unite with him.
That's how I understand it. Yes, indeed, after the Crucifixion, many Jews came to unite with the spiritually active Jesus, but as Christians, not as representatives of the Jewish nation.
If the Jewish leadership had united with him during his ministry, indeed, the whole population would likely have come along. There were multiple failures, none the least, the failure of John the Baptist to fully support and unite with Jesus after his initial baptism of Jesus at the Jordan.
Nah, its been dying for many years now. Too many people have woken up and realized the scam. The cutting of USAid won't hurt that, for sure, but the trend has been in the wind since the nonsense first started.
That's not bad.
I've heard that this year, the orthodox (and Greek) Easter falls on the same day as the Western Easter. Is that true?
AI is off the mark (imo)
"It is better to obey the Lord than to offer sacrifices to him. It is better to listen to him than to offer the fat from rams." 1 Samuel 15:22
There are always two ways it could go. This is why the in the Old Testament era ("For all the Prophets and the Law prophesied until John. And if you are willing to accept it, he is the Elijah who was to come.…" Matt 11:13) God gave two types of prophesy about Jesus path. One, to be the Lord of Glory, accepted, and two, to be rejected and become the Lord of Suffering. In Matt 11;33, Jesus himself tells us that all of the prophecies before John were only for times up until John (when Jesus lived).
Everything Jesus did in his public ministry for the first two years was focused on getting the people of Israel to believe in him, and to NOT reject him. ("This is the work of God, that you believe in him whom he has sent." John 6:29).
If the Israelites had recognized and received Jesus, THIS would have atoned symbolically for the sin of Adam and Eve, who rejected God's word. Unity with Jesus was the necessary offering (obedience).
And recall, Jesus could forgive sin BEFORE he went to the Cross.
So how or why did the cross become necessary? It became a necessary, secondary path because the Israelites rejected him.
God had chosen the descendants of Abraham to be the representative of all humanity. If Israel accepted and united with Jesus (doing his will and following his word), then this would lay the foundation for ALL humanity to receive Jesus. Not just in spirit, but also in the flesh. On this Earth.
With Israel as a people united with Jesus, and then the rest of the world following, the Kingdom would have arrived both in spirit and in flesh, and the ruler of this world (Satan) would have had no where to stand.
But what happened? Israel, as a people, rejected Jesus, and eventually murdered him (by proxy, via Rome). Jesus lamented this situation. ("O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, who kills the prophets and stones those sent to her, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were unwilling!" Matt 23:37)
This was the gravest of sins. Adam and Eve fell in the garden, in their spiritual immaturity, but humanity rejecting God's son was a far more terrible sin. And therefore, a price had to be paid. The price? The most precious, precious thing. Jesus flesh was the most precious thing in the universe. It took God the creator thousand and thousands of years to bring Jesus' in the flesh. God's own body, recreated in the world. His body was more precious than all humanity.
So a price had to be paid. This is why the cross had to happen. Sacrifice became necessary, because obedience wasn't forthcoming.
At the pivotal time, when Humanity experienced the advent of the Son of God, something God had been preparing for for thousands of years, Israel and humanity as a whole failed, and fell into faithlessness. Again.
So, at this juncture, a second path forward had to be opened. This is the meaning of the Cross. Jesus paid the price for the faithlessness of Israel, who represented all the nations of the world, by sacrificing his flesh. He offered his flesh in lieu of the sin of rejection. Sacrifice, because obedience was not forthcoming. "Believe in him who he has sent..."
What was necessary before that point was simple faith and unity. Obedience. In unity, Jesus could forgive all humanity, even without the torturous path of physical suffering.
And that's why the second coming had to then happen. On the Mount of transfiguration, after two years of endless effort to get Israel to accept and unite with him, Jesus consulted with Moses and Elijah in spirit, and only from that point on did he talk about the cross and the necessity of death and suffering. That was the turning point.
And because Jesus' hand was forced in to a situation where he would offer up his flesh for the faithlessness of the people at that time, the flesh of all faithful believers who follow Jesus is STILL subject to Satan's attacks and influence, even though in spirit, we are saved to a realm in spirit with Satan is not longer master.
Paul cited this situation: (Rom 8:23 "Not only that, but we ourselves, who have the first fruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies.")
Jesus could have adopted us when he was alive, in both spirit and flesh. But when his flesh became a sacrifice, that path was no longer open. This is why Christ must return. To adopt us as his children, in both spirit and in flesh, to redeem our bodies.
The second coming became necessary because God the Father and Jesus had to pay the price for Israel - chosen and prepared Israel - rejecting Jesus Christ. The flesh was offered up as the price for redemption of the spirit, but the flesh still has not been redeemed, because Christ's own flesh had to become the offering. Sacrifice, not obedience.
People forget that Jesus could forgive sins BEFORE the cross. If Israel had wholeheartedly recognized and accepted him, do you think that Jesus could NOT forgive their sins? Their unity with Jesus, in spirit and flesh, would have been enough to open the way to the kingdom both in heaven AND on earth. Right there.
Jesus accomplished spiritual salvation for us, through the cross, and opened up the kingdom in the spirit. But the physical salvation was delayed until the second coming. Clearly, this was NOT the path Jesus preferred.
Just as when the Israelites demanded a king, God reluctantly gave them one through Samuel, even though it was not his preferred way. Their faithlessness forced God to give them a lesser good.
This is like the cross. God wanted all of Israel, and then the world, to accept, embrace, unite with and obey Jesus. When they did not, He had no choice but to offer Jesus's flesh as a sacrifice.
"It is better to obey the Lord than to offer sacrifices to him. It is better to listen to him than to offer the fat from rams." 1 Samuel 15:22
This perspective may conflict with some people's understanding of theology, but we have to remember: we have NOT had the full picture. As Paul said: "Now we see but a dim reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known."
Even Paul recognized that his perception and understanding of the truth was only partial. When Christ returns, he will raise us to a new, higher level. For this reason, we have to learn how to listen.
At least, that's how I understand it.
At the end of the day, however, I resonate with Maude's comment: It's not about religion, its about relationship. And the core of that relationship is heart. The Door of Faith is the doorway into the Realm of Heart where indeed, Christ is King.
Praise God. Thank you Jesus. You paid the price for humanities rejection, and opened up the door to spiritual salvation, and your heart shines eternal. Come soon, oh Lord. Come soon.
Good Friday is the 2nd most important (celebrated) holiday in Australia. Everything shuts on Good Friday, second only to Christmas Day. Easter Sunday, not as much.
I appreciate the fact that there are still some vestiges of our Christian foundation here.
kek.
Following on:
A 2017 BuzzFeed News report identified NewsPunch as being the second-largest source of popular fake stories spread on Facebook that year,[6] and a June 2018 Poynter Institute analysis identified NewsPunch as being debunked over 80 times in 2017 and 2018 by International Fact-Checking Network–accredited factcheckers such as Snopes, FactCheck.org, PolitiFact, and the Associated Press.
This is what is both hilarious but informative. This is a great example of how the Problem - Response - Solution dynamic (Hegelian dialectic) is used by the Cabalites to advance their agendas.
I did a very cursory dig on these guys - the 'fact checkers', not TPV/NP, although I did start digging on them around the same time - in 2018, and posted it on reddit/r/GreatAwakening before it was banned. Reposted it here a few years back, for reference.
All these names come together. I'm sure there are some real solid researches on the so-called fact checking network out there, but I've not read any yet.
Take a read. Even a very cursory did shows pretty much everything you'd expect!
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IXu4pi6j/repost-uncovering-the-fact-check/
I have never encountered the name GlobeNewsWire in relation to YourNewsWire. That doesn't mean there isn't a connection, only that I've never come across it.
Dig
A quick look at https://www.globenewswire.com/ indicates that these are totally unrelated.
Style, audience, technique, quality of presentation, language availability, etc.
YNW has always been (even in its current iteration as TPV) a rather dinky little operation, most likely manned by less than half a dozen operators or contributors. They're also cheesy, over-the-top, and squarely aimed at the more gullible end of town in Alt-media audience central.
hth
Upshot: don't mess with the winn.
Some interdasting work. For the moment, I shall continue as a very interested DA. Devil's avocado.
Only because the passion your work is exhibiting is so darn hot. Also, I have some experience with international orgs, and I know by experience that a lot of things are not simply black and white at that level.
Will revisit here.
updoogle
Side note: On these levels, evil is not uniform. It is characterized by factions, which strive for supremacy and advantage. These factions have a level of vested interest in shaping how others view their competitors.
Well, you've been looking more closely at this sauce (the compiler), so I take your comments seriously. Admittedly, my avocado comes from a lot of anecdotal experience and initial impressions, and to some extent trepidation, given the subject matter.
So, I'm not sure if we disagree, but I'm always happy to disagree with you, winn, based on data and experience (because you bring so much quality to the work)!
As to secret societies, in general, I agree that they are more often than not, pernicious. Evil thrives in secrecy, and corruption thrives in secrecy (hidden), so even a secret society founded with the best possible motives can end up providing evil a pathway in.
But secrecy in and of itself is not evil. Consider (various speculations about) our White Hats. The idea that when the Kennedy murder went down, various good guys realized how much power the Cabal had obtained, and they had to go secret. Through the years, organizing, laying low, planning, all in secret, until the move was ready, which, in it's most recent (and successful) iteration, is our own beloved POTUS.
Personally, I don't know how much of the above paragraph is accurate, but I accept it as a broad working hypothesis on how we got here.
Also consider Q. Anonymity involves, in some sense, secrecy. Also, Q blew open the world of the intelligence 'community' and operations to a massive population of red-pillers, researchers and citizen journos. The expression 'clandestine' comes to mind. In the intel work, secrecy is often necessary.
For that reason, I hesitate to condemn simply on the basis of secrecy. There are, I suspect, some secret societies for good, BUT, as I wrote before, it's a perilous world.
For this reason, developing an evaluation of individuals, groups, societies and organizations should be done based strongly on motivation and purpose, not purely methodology.
Many of the secret societies we know about (to some extent) have been utilized or mobilized towards evil. But this is true of many, many dimensions of our society, corporations, organizations, clubs, groups, cliques, etc.
All in all, I sympathize strongly with the sense of repulsion you express here, and understand, I think, why you 'paint with a board brush'.
I would only recommend tempering that sense of repulsion with the thought that ultimately, good or evil hinges on the purpose for which someone or something is put into motion. Truly, many of the purposes we've discovered in the world of intel and the underbelly of the matrix are so vile as to warrant utter repulsion.
But, ironically, in order to survive in a world of evil, good at times has to be secretive. Under Rome, seedling Christianity itself would have perhaps met the criteria of 'a secret society'. (I recall being taken into the catacombs as a kid when my family visited Rome.)
Therefore, purpose MUST be taken into account, and one should ideally and simply, take care not to throw out any babies out with the bathwater.
updoogle
Yes, I think so. Have the idea to at least post something about the approaches used (digging) because I think they are instructive. But new work has come in, so it may take a while, if even.
fwiw, the domain name and who is searches, etc, are a great departure point for putting together the data. Very often one of my go-to techniques. It was easy to follow on given the starting point you provided!
Methinks there are some anons who are noobs still, 8 years in.
Methinks also that there are some anons who think they are simply anons and who do not realize that they have actually become inadvertent shills.
If that last group is a third category, they need to wake up and realize that they are not helping. So, time to sit and think more.
Devil's avocado:
Unfortunately, on this list, the compiler offers no sauces. Where did he get the list from? how? When? based on what? I'd have to dig to have confidence in the list.
More importantly, religious history, including Christian history, is filled with religious and theologically based 'witchhunts', where people are vilified by association with a particular group or sect or whatever.
It becomes a witch hunt when it is driven by a fervent religious passion on the basis of I know the Truth, and they (that person, that group, that belief) is Wrong, and the agenda becomes filled with a sort of self-righteous flame.
There are many, many legitimate practioners of faith and groups that, because they do not conform to the thinking or doctrine or practices of the mainstream, and the establishment i.e. the Religious establishment, are blacklisted, black-sheeped and eventually persecuted.
I'm not talking about the Jesuits here. The problematic issues of the Jesuits are well documented. But there have been sincere and good faith people who joined such orders.
No one is impervious to corruption. The Vatican did not start out as corrupt as it became. indeed, the history of Christianity is one of constant reformation, rejuvenation, and re-alignment, all of which have been necessary because while Christianity is rooted in Christ, his earthly instruments are far from perfect.
Personally, I take this list with a grain of salt. I know the spirit very well. There are hundreds, thousands of websites by people who profess to be Christian, but think that they are Right and in the perfect position to judge, finger, and attack others. I know that spirit very well.
It's a difficult path, and a difficult line to walk. To adhere to God, cling to God, and to separate out evil, and identify it where it lurks. But lead me into any group, church, organization, collective or to any individual who thinks they can justifiably accuse and point out evil in others, and I'll show you such darkness of the soul, you'd be fleeing in tears.
I am not saying that any group, order, clique or church are, by definition of being religious, good. one cannot say that. But likewise, one cannot say that any group, order, clique or church are, by definition of being different or not "orthodox" are evil.
We should never forget that Christ himself was persecuted and murdered because the collective of religious leaders at the time decided he was blasphemous, wrong, and taught things that they decided were against their beliefs.
We should also remember that the very first accuser was Lucifer. Satan. He is the Father of accusation. For this reason, from a spiritual perspective, one should tread very, very carefully, when casting stones. The practice comes from a perilous place.
Just saying. The whole set of secret societies, groups, orders, collectives, organizations, etc, are very deep rabbit holes. Some, I think, take them rather too lightly. Babies and bathwater come to mind.
Anyway, end of avocado.
PS. A rather interesting looking 'guest post' by the same compiler.
I'll addendum by saying that there are a few related issues that I personally want to consider when approaching the topic of 'secret societies'. One, I distinguish between legitimate religious orders and corrupted ones. Two, I recognize that evil is everywhere, and often works its hardest to make goodness appear evil, as it does to make evil appear as goodness. Three, that as faithful Christians, I know, very clearly, from Paul, that I do NOT have the whole picture. (for now we see dimly...) So I'm wary of judging purely based on theological or faith issues. Four, ultimately, good or evil is defined by purpose and motivation. The devil has often ensnared those with good intentions.
Wow. This is the Way.
Small little country by most standards, El Salvador. And the President of that country comes to the Big, Big, Big United States and says:
I'm eager to help.
Man, if even one dozen other heads of state or national leaders had that spirit and attitude, America and the World would flip dramatically.
Anons, this is simple. We did NOT get this far by coincidence. Trump is in full fucking control. Timing is everything.
Had to scroll down to the bottom of the comments to get this based input. Me, I agree 100%. And, I think we got a bunch of woosie frogs all whinging and moaning and getting all upset. You'd think, finally, after all this time, some folks would realize there is a plan. A battle plan, and strategy, and so MUCH is happening right now, so much is clearly going on behind the scenes (obvious statement, man).
How do people not realize by now that DJT knows exactly what he is doing?
This is Beethoven's 5th Symphony x 10.000. Right now, centering on DJT and the international sovereign alliance, team DJT is flipping the entire globe upside down. Hints and nods and deployments are dropping each and every week.
The war? It's like this. Tthere are 1000 lines along which things need to advance, and each of those lines is being moved forward in a designed and coordinated strategy to effect complete decimation of the enemy. And some folks get their knickers in a twist because Bondi isn't releasing those 2 or 3 lines that they think are so important. Jeeez, frogs.
I think that when frogs think like this, they have lost the 40,000 ft view, and worse, they have forgotten their role and job in this war.
Yes, it's critical and important to build public support for, interesting in, and pressure towards those objectives that DJT needs and wants to accomplish, but this needs to be done from a position of understanding what he's doing, not from a position of complaining and whinging based on my own narrow perspective.
I've been thinking about this for a while. I think the real hint that frogs should be following is the General. LT Col Michael Flynn. I've noticed that he is not working 'in the administration' even though DJT has offered him "ten different jobs". Why?
His mission. His mission is to generate grassroots support and mobilize the People. And anons and digital warriors should be the vanguard for that.
One of the messages Flynn is putting out all the time these days is 'accountability'. And that's the objective. So he's always talking about accountability, that people NEED to be held accountable. But he pushes this while supporting Team DJT (in the administration).
Frogs should be pushing the message that accountability needs to happen. But we should be doing this by see what DJT is doing, grasping what is happening under neath the surface, and being a positive force, but a bunch of whiney tadpoles griping because this or that member of the team isn't "doing what I want and what I think has to be done".
So, keep pressure, but lift up the work. When more and more people demand accountability, it will most certainly come. But accountability happens very much at the back end of the operation, the war. It starts from the beginning of the end. Me? I think we are still at the end of the middle, and the start of the end hasn't yet begun.
And, I love everything that DJT is doing. He has earned my trust. If all the information and training from Q and anon work hasn't given me that, maybe its time to take a step back and question, do I really understand what is going on?
Kinda harsh, maybe, and praps its a good thing that my comment is down here with yours, OSM, because maybe it isn't for everyone.
I've never been more relaxed that I am now the whole darn past 8 years. To quote the phrase:
It's habbening.
Thank you Wulf. Having the multiple input really helps to make the decision based, (imo) and it also makes it both easier to embrace (by me) but also getting the mod perspectives helps me to expand my frame of reference.
One idea that popped into my head is to do a post that takes the techniques and strategies employed in the discussion, and write that up as a generic "how to...." in terms of verifying, identifying, approaching questionable websites (i.e. fake, not what they appear). A sort of debunking case study. This could be done without any specific reference to this or any other website, using unidentified examples.
That said, wow, this website is extremely dasting from a research perspective. After going through an examination from various angles, it was a little mind blowing to arrive at the dude who did a whole write up on it.
I'm not too saavy in the ways of web design or data theft, code manipulation, but I can understand that potential might exist here. So happy to defer to the modclusion. (That's "mods' conclusion". Coined, April 2025.)
Thanks Props. Really happy to have a bunch of moddies take a considered look.
Well, it's great to get the mods (several) perspective and input. Not difficult to accept the conclusion.
Thank you mod. Your service is of great value! Let no one tell you otherwise!
It's amazing that you get around to doing so much.
/ no sarc
PS. Thank you mod. Always.
Note: Mel Gibson News has no direct connection to Mel Gibson. In case you were wondering.