wait.... is it possible that person can have actual photo ID that is NOT a driver's license? OMG, shock.....
You don't need to. Just realize, that when Maher comes out and says this, it gives social permission to lots of die hard Democrats who also think the full-blown insanity is not their cup of tea.
That's the real story here. Once someone like Maher says this, for whatever motive or reason, the impact is that it gives a level of 'social permission' to people in the Demosphere who are leaning towards the bail ship door. That social permission is important, because a LOT of people are influenced by what others think of them, and when there is no real social permission, they cannot make the right move (not enough conviction or character).
Hey, I sort of like McGregor.
As a medical doctor (well, a psychiatrist) he pushed back when the cabal controlled govt in Aus was going nuts during covid, and he's fairly informed about many anon (aka Q-related) ideas.
But as far as I can see, he's also highly given to the hopium pipe, not exactly careful with his research, pronouncements, and inflooencing. Big on claims, not so hot on research, data and accuracy. (I mean, that's my impression from a distance.)
I mean, when is "Today"? Any sources on that, Russell?
As far as I know, Solomon revisited the idea that because Obama would have immunity for official acts done during his presidency, he would have no basis for pleading the fifth if brought before a court to testify.
Which is very different to what Dr. McGregor is claiming here. I'm really curious as to when and where John Solomon actually said what's the Doc is claiming. Because Grok cannot seen to find it.
Doc? You know, research? Facts? Not clicks....Please.
Yeah. I mean "Thank you for being honest this time" doesn't exactly paint a picture of unbiased, objective and impartial use of information and AI technology.... Grok's a database and search engine. Input = output. Not a sentient entity capable of honesty or dishonesty. Apparently.
Comon. That's just a conspiracy theor....... uh. oh.
Hmmm....
Congrats to RubberDuck for giving proper context to his info, aka "7 years ago".
That said..... <ahem>
Evergreen is also the iconic shipping & logistics company known for trafficking children
Oh yeah, 'known' by who? I know there was all sorts of the usual anons speculation and people promoting theories that Evergreen shipping was transporting children, trafficking them especially in the trapped Suez incident, but is there any actual evidence of this? On the public record?
As far as I know, this is 'anon theory' and 'anon belief' and certainly not established fact with publicly verifiable (open source) evidence.
So, um, yeah, nice 7 year news re: an old tweet, but as one commentator on X wrote (but never got an answer to):
Anyone ever figure out why he did that?
How is this post stick-worthy? Or relevant? What is Rubber Duck asserting? What's he trying to say?
Has any tangible connection between Killary's codename and the Shipping Conglomerate been established, with opsint?
-
One, I like it. I mean, we're not restricted to any one analogy, and sometimes X analogy can illustrate certain things that Y analogy cannot. But this is a good one.
-
Yes, I think that should be considered and factored in. IF Xi wants to cooperate with DJT (and Putin), then he can certainly use this for (within the Chinese structure): you guys did bad stuff! Bye bye
Similar to my thinking.
I believe the CCP killed Xi's Dad?!
Apparently they essentially ostracized him and drove him to death. But not certain about the details.
On DJT's Capitulation Tour, Xi invited DJT to the Forbidden City for Dinner (Never been done before)
Another dot on the map that needs to be accounted for. (Join the dots-style)
Basically, the rest is how I think (or how I am inclined to hope), but then, I think if I can figure out the reality even 70% of the way, I'm doing well. So I suspect that I've missed the mark to some extent, but hopefully, time will tell.
Chinese civilization has been a massive and important part of the world's ethical, religious, and technological development over the past several (4?) thousand years, often ignored and undervalued by Western thinkers and Western people. And just when Christianity began to break into China, the Western Cabal began to exploit and undermine the country.
By the communist takeover, up to 4 million Christians (Protestants and Catholics).
Daddy's little AI says: Today, some estimates say that between 60 and 130 million people are Christians in CCP China (5-9%) of the population. Official govt figures say 38-44 million CHristians (registered chuurches only).
Outside of China, around 50-60 million.
Hmmm...
I do want to reiterate what I wrote in the post: I'm not convinced that Xi is a ruthless insane dictator, and I'm also not convinced that he isn't.
Meanwhile, there are frogs who are adamantly convinced of either of these possibilities, which I can respect, but I think its also worth emphasizing one of the subtitles that someone above commented on: If (as per the Q drop) China and Russia are cooperating / coordinating with POTUS to eliminate the satanic NWO, this does not necessarily preclude the idea that Xi is playing the long game, and is necessarily a 'good guy'.
On the other hand, the circumstances around Trumps first visit to China, the dinner in the hidden palace precedents, and the history between DJT and Xi strongly suggest to me that somehow, Xi is up to good, in his own way, against a beast of horrible proportions.
Note, the so-called purges another frog cited as evidence of Xi's evilness can also be viewed through a completely different lens as evidence of Xi dismantling an evil and obstructing entrenched CCP opposition.
The suggestion that the Shanghai clique are a nice bunch of fellows I find contrasting sharply with the information I've encountered re: China, inasmuch as the Shanghai faction was headed by Jiang Zemin and which includes Hu JinTao, under who the persecution of the Falun Gong and the work of organ harvesting, etc started.
That said, the persecution of the Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities was severely ramped up under Xi, but looking at the devastation in Europe by radical Islamic infiltration, could anyone blame him? Apprently Xi likened Islamic extremism to a "virus-like contagion" and a "dangerously addictive drug"....
Hmmm....
Two thoughts:
-
A very good and clear summation of a point I sort of worked on. Assuming we're on the right track, and the war Q has exposed is real, then this is a principle all frogs should understand: "Killing the deep state is a different task in each different environment, requiring different tactics"
-
Exactly as I was thinking, too.
Thanks for the feedback.
If you want to think about it deeper there are factions even within the deep state
Yes, this is certainly true.
In conceive of the reality as something like this:
in the evil realm, you have factions that hate and want to conquer, to rise and become supreme, because that is their nature: selfish gain. Loyalty is to self above all, and cooperation only comes because of perceived self-benefit.
In the realm of good, there is a cooperative principle, because self-gain is not the highest value, but the benefit of 'the whole': the whole family, the whole society, the whole nation, or the whole world. Unselfishness is understood as an important principle and way of living; many times, the individual or group sacrifice themselves so that others can benefit.
Hence, in the evil realm, conflict and selfish gain are the ultimate principle, but in the realm of good, unselfishness and self-sacrifice and therefore a unified purpose are the pinnacle of moral virtue.
well, consider the microcosmic sector of Criminal justice. When taking down a crime syndicate, for example, you cannot move too early until all the 'ducks are lined up'. Doing otherwise will allow significant parts of the organization to avoid capture and then the syndicate simply continues in a slightly different form or with different actors.
In prosecuting, you cannot prosecute until everything is ready, because as soon as you charge one actor and take them to trial, they have the right to 'discovery' of all the evidence against them, so if you are using evidence obtained from this or that source in the field, or which can potentially be evidence against other actors, suddenly those other actors have access to everything you have on them as well as sources (ie. agents) that have infiltrated their organization.
Then, you have to have a judicial system that is clean, correct, and lawful, not subject to corruption of infiltration.
The point here is, its not simply a matter of 'going in and arresting the key figures'.
What we're dealing with here is a systemic international cabal structure developed over hundreds of years. Like dismantling a 1000 megaton bomb that has 10,000 complicated components, any of which, if not dismantled int he correct order, to trigger the bomb. Anyway, that's how I've understood it since around 2019.
An interesting perspective worth considering.
umm.... well, while Chess represents (or uses the motif) of the Court to be a game of intrigue and war, Go is a representation of the cosmos and is based on Ancient philosophy (Chinese), cosmology and aesthetics. Taoism (yin-yang principle), Confucianism and moral development (ethics), etc. the grid 19 x 19 = 361 intersections, symbolizes the number of days in the lunar year. Interaction of order and chaos, simplicity and complexity, capture and control of opponent (as opposed to killing opponent) on the cosmic stage.
Where did you get the 1:4 idea from? I'm curious.
Historically, they are neither innovators nor leaders
I do not think this is true. Perhaps you are thinking of the Japanese? Which is by and large very true.
a) Printing - China was the first civilization to develop a form of printing on paper, etc. Woodblock printing in use by the 7th century. Movable type during the Song dynasty (11th century). Compare with Gutenberg's movable type printing in the 15th century.
b) Paper Money - Tang dynasty - 8th century; Song Dynasty - 11th century. Putting aside the issue of govt issued paper money abuse for fiat, China was the first civilization to do paper money.
c) Fireworks and explosives - A form of 'firecrackers' (made from Bamboo) used around 200 BC, Gunpowder and actual fireworks in the Tang and Song Dynasties, 7th century onwards. Sophisticated fireworks especially in the Song dynasty (11th century +). Canons etc, and forms of guns in the 12th century.
Fireworks and Gunpowder technology only came to Europe via trade in the 13/14th centuries. The Europeans were the ones to take the tech and then develop it to a higher more sophisticated grade.
d) Paper - unlike papyrus developed by the Egyptians, the Chinese had pulp-based paper manufacture during the Han Dynasty (BC), and then in the centuries after Christ, widespread and standardized. This technology spread to Islamic world first (800's), and arrived in Europe in the 11th and 12th centuries.
e) Other: First magnetic compasses, silk production, Porcelain (kek, 'china'), cast iron, suspension bridges, umbrellas, and lots, lots more.
If anything, the Europeans have been the one's to take these various forms of invented technology and engineering, and raised that to a higher levels as the Renaissance took over.
The Japanese also took these technologies from China and developed them, and in the last 100+ years, took technological developments from the Western world and highly refined or perfected those. But in terms of innovative history, China and Japan are worlds apart. China being the most prolific in ancient times up until the full blossoming of the Christian era in Europe.
First the British Banking Cartel and Cabal, then Communism, all these have been a severe blight on the Chinese people and civilization, the former perhaps because they were unable to adapt or compete with the pure manipulative terrorism the European Cabal utilized.
<ahem> As far as I know....
Note: Chinese people can have mistaken impressions and ideas just as much as any other person, whether American, Japanese, German, or Zambian. Do you disagree?
What.... do you think it is "clear to anyone who is American" that Donald Trump is a great guy? Or, "It is clear to anyone who is British that Kier Starmer is a globalist tool"?
The Soros - Xi conflict is pretty clear by statements each have made. Eg. Soros: "Xi Jin Ping is the greatest threat to democracy in the world today" Xi (Via the official national outlet): "George Soros is the son of Satan, the devil incarnate."
Look it up.
Sure, it might be kayfabe, but I doubt that.
I think claiming perfect perception on the basis of your nationality or ethnicity is a rather misguided path.
I.e. "I am Chinese. Therefore I know perfectly exactly who Xi is and what he is doing."
Nope. Doesn't work like that.
"People who are not Chinese should not think or speculate about things that are Chinese".
Nope, that doesn't work either.
Hey, I appreciate you have your opinion and view, but its YOUR opinion and view, and your skin color, ethnic background or ancestry does not make you somehow infallible or even necessarily more aware.
It don't work like that.
That said, I appreciate your making a comment. Can I suggest you actually make your case, and state your reasoning, present the data points, etc, that you see rather than just claiming some sort of ethnic superiority? This is GAW, not reddit.
I think your interpretation is too literal, and is quite different from the concept I have as I employed this expression.
In other words, your comments here are about your specific conception of "the notion of good twin evil twin" rather than what I was talking about. Because my 'notion' or the concept I am expressing here absolutely addresses peoples of nations thinking for themselves (a critical aspect of the war we're in), and has NOTHING to do with 'a concept of trying to control twins' or not recognizing people as thinking individuals created by God.
I don't think you're doing it deliberately or concisely, but your comments on said 'notion' bears almost zero resemblance to what I'm attempting to convey.
You might try to put aside the idea of 'twins' and simply recognize what I'm saying as a metaphor for the idea that there are both good forces and evil forces at work in all nations, attempting to influence the peoples of the nation and individuals that make up those peoples.
I don't know whose 'notion' you are talking about, but it sure isn't mine. Just to be clear.
I think how the Trump - Xi, USA - China dynamic progresses over the next two months will be an important indicator and possibly give us confirmation of ... "exactly what is going on".
Thanks for the feedback, btw
Let's also not dismiss Mossad, MI6, etc. Lots of intel agencies in the mix, I reckon.
Wait to till you try 5D Chinese Chess.
Well hang on. Let's not slide into clickbaitery just because we are not fans of the Bartender.
She said, in that clip, she doesn't support "elements of the institution that were founded on Jim Crow"...
So, she's not exactly saying the Senate itself was founded on Jim Crow, but is asserting that elements operating within the senate were.
I mean, she's good enough fodder for memes without actively distorting her words. But then, on X.com, the clicks are what counts....
Sure, her whole comment is dumb, but its dumb Y, not dumb X.
just saying
The dumbing down of alt-media and of the information flow in pursuit of useful or effective soundbites ain't gonna help anyone...
Babylon Bee enters the chat....
Democrats Say They Are Perfectly Capable Of Rigging Elections Without Any Help From China
Go mom!