I tried to introduce some people to Q. They read the first post about Hillary being arrested, say "that's BS, it never happened how can Q be real then?" and pretty much give up reading it. What am I supoose to say to that? I personally know there is way more to Q. I've followed it from the beginning. Just not sure how about tackle Qs first post which immediately gives them a red flag.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
11.2 & 11.4 are not dates. That's where people get hung up on that specific post.
Recent anon decodes suggest it is from the DoD manual on judicial processes during occupation.
It didn't happen to Hillary, it happened to Saudi Arabia. Right info, but he used the wrong names and location as misdirection. Can't exactly go online and post "hey there's gonna be a huge military op in SA lol" so he gave enough clues for us to figure it out. It really did happen exactly as Q predicted, you just have to look there and not here.
I looked up some articles and it appears the arrest happened in early November 2017. That is pretty damn close I'll say.
Wait 4 hours, they'll believe
"How do I prove Q to be true?"
Q will (or will not) prove itself to be true. Your job isn't to convince others of the validity of what we know. Your job is to help others understand why their world is falling apart when all this shit goes down. Be a beacon of hope in dark times.
This is why, imo, it is better to introduce them to the proofs linking Q to POTUS first. Q drops are not in chronological order so they are going to be as skeptical as the anons were at first...totally understandable.
There has been way to many coincidences.