From a Military Telegram, maybe you guys know what this means?:
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
You know, this is really bizarre, but Seward Square actually now sits where a hotel used to sit back in 1841... That hotel was where John Tyler was inaugurated, at 6th and Pennsylvania. Bizarre
starting to seem like there really ARE no coincidences. All of this was probably engineered before hand to be perceived in the way it was. Whether intentions were good or bad, or neither... it's still creepy as fuck.
What's really crazy, is that Tyler basically stole the presidency because at the time, neither the Constitution nor statutory law actually stated that the VP would BECOME President when there was a vacancy. Rather, the VP was to assume the duties of the presidency, as in, temporarily ACT as president. The original intent seems to be that there should have been a new election for a replacement president. Arguably, it should have been an election by the House because the process of using Electors was only proscribed for regularly scheduled elections.
JQA, Henry Clay and others argued this when Tyler just permanently took the presidency for himself. It was controversial, but his opponents couldn't really stop him. So if Tyler had the first stolen presidency, how fitting would it be for Trump to be the first to take back a stolen presidency?