2
MAGAdeburger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting that the article refers to John jnr, Mr. Kennedy and Mr. John F. Kennedy jnr, but never "JFK Jr."

2
MAGAdeburger 2 points ago +2 / -0

The irony is that climate alarmists are and most "scientists" are psychics and charlatans... Dawkins included

2
MAGAdeburger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Absolutely.... look how the Guy Fawkes mask became a symbol of anarchists even though Fawkes was a Roman Catholic theocrat who tried to blow up Parliament and restore a Catholic to the throne

2
MAGAdeburger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rand Paul calling a spade a spade?

I used to play the card game Spades as a kid. Ace of Spades was top Trump Card.

Also, need an Ace of Spades to get this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_man's_hand

2
MAGAdeburger 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Alas, the poor weak ignorant dupe, human nature. There is so much king craft, priest craft, gentlemens craft, peoples craft, doctors craft, lawyers craft, merchants craft, tradesmens craft, laborers craft, and Devils craft in the world that it seems a desperate and impractical project to undeceive it. Do you wonder that Voltaire and Paine have made proselytes?" - John Adams to Benjamin Rush, 21 December 1809

https://youtu.be/GgnClrx8N2k

But alas, all hope is not lost!!!

"[Paine's] Bilingsgate stolen from Blounts oracles of Reason from Bolinbroke, Voltaire, Berenger &c will never discredit Christianity: which will hold its ground in some degree as long as human Nature shall have any thing Moral, or Intellectual left in it. The Christian Religion as I understand it, is the Brightness of the Glory and the express Portrait of the Character of the eternal, self existent independant benevolent all powerful and all mercifull Creator, Preserver, and Father of the Universe: the first good, first perfect and first fair. It will last as long as the World. Neither Savage nor civilized Man without a Revelation could ever have discovered or invented it. Ask me not then whether I am a Catholic or Protestant, Calvinist or Arminian? As far as they are Christians, I wish to be a Fellow Disciple with them all." - John Adams to Benjamin Rush, 21 January 1810

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CYTQ6gpcuYA

1
MAGAdeburger 1 point ago +1 / -0

With $9 million to buy New Orleans, Monroe comes back with half of the American continent... though arguably a bargain, it put the US into significant debt to, you guessed it, a BRITISH bank.

"But the resourceful Barbé-Marbois had an answer for that too. He had contacts at Britain’s Baring & Co. Bank, which agreed, along with several other banks, to make the actual purchase and pay Napoléon cash. The bank then turned over ownership of the Louisiana Territory to the United States in return for bonds, which were repaid over 15 years at 6 percent interest, making the final purchase price around $27 million."

Even Jefferson questioned whether the purchase was constitutional. But whatevs, GOD WILLS IT! No wonder JQA and some New England Federalists were pissed... spending a bunch of tax money to extend the political power of the southern (slave state) faction, while amassing a large debt to a bank in a country (Britain) which was still fighting with the French, thus pinning the US even tighter both sides while struggling to stay neutral.

And the icing on the cake... Lewis & Clark sent on a "exploratory expedition" that was billed as a "let's check out the cool animals and trees" adventure, when in reality it was more of a military scouting mission to see what potential obstacles might get in the way of America spreading all the way to the Pacific.

Funny how America fights a war with GB from 1812-1815, while still in debt to a British bank for the purchase of New Orleans, with payments scheduled until 1818, and the final major battle takes place AFTER the Treaty of Ghent at New Orleans....

2
MAGAdeburger 2 points ago +2 / -0

NO MORE TRIBUTE. And like Jefferson did to the Barbary Pirates, send in the Navy and Marines.

5
MAGAdeburger 5 points ago +5 / -0

The correct word should be "halted" not "suspended." It was temporary and required. The halt actually STOPPED Twitter's stock price from climbing. It shot up 11% in 5 min. Halt. And it ended the day in the red. That's a good thing, unless you're holding stock in Twitter. But it is important to note that there was a halt, because that halt was caused by fuckery attempts to blast up the price knowing that a dump was coming... Insiders who knew @Jack was leaving, which would likley cause some selling, which eventually did happen right after the halt lifted.

14
MAGAdeburger 14 points ago +14 / -0

Technically, Judah was the father of the Judahites. His father was Jacob, the "father of Israel" the 12 tribes, of which Judah was one. Jesus still comes from the line of David, through Judah, through Jacob, through Isaac, through Abraham.

There seems to be a compelling case that the so called "Jews" were actually through the line of Esau and the term was bastardized to apply to all remaining Israelites who merged with those of Judea following the collopse of Israel.

Yes, Islam draws its line through Ishmael, another "first son" but illegitimate in terms of birthright.

3
MAGAdeburger 3 points ago +3 / -0

A better question to have been asked, should have been "did JFK Jr. actually die in that plane crash as the official story says?" Whether or nor he was alive as of 12/12/2018 is less important than the circumstances surrounding his mysterious death.

2
MAGAdeburger 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Not retired" could also mean he was forced out, or that his term of service was up and he didn't reenlist. Retired usually indicates voluntary resignation and I believe that requires a minimum of 20 years service in most if not all military branches.

Former simply means that at some point, he was a Seal but he did not spend 20 years as a Seal and retire from that service. He is no longer a Seal. It is quite possible, even likely he's still in the service (not retired) in some capacity, probably still within the Navy.... could be Space Force... could be JAG?

2
MAGAdeburger 2 points ago +2 / -0

True, or just antisemitic? 🤔

https://rense.com/general81/d3ss.htm

Of personal note, I was at the Touro Synagogue several years ago for a conference on religious liberty in American History. Involvement in the slave trade never once crossed my mind... but then again I also am reminded of the shit of a human being called Judah P. Benjamin, so perhaps there's some meat to the story presented in this link

1
MAGAdeburger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Into the eventual English colonies or into the various European colonies in "America"? If the latter, I think the answer you're looking for would be the Spanish and Portuguese.

There's also this interesting research:

https://rense.com/general81/d3ss.htm

1
MAGAdeburger 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Jay's treaty, as first drawn, consented that no cotton should be exported from America. It changed the very history of the country when, in 1793, Eli Whitney invented the saw-gin, by which a slave could clean 1,000 pounds of cotton per day. Slavery at once ceased to be a passive, innocuous institution, promising soon to die out, and became a means of gain, to be upheld and extended in all possible ways."

2
MAGAdeburger 2 points ago +2 / -0

As a historian, I've always considered 1840 an interesting year. "Tippecanoe and Tyler Too." William Henry Harrison, the last president born as a British subject in the Thirteen Colonies. Quite an impressive public service record both as a statesman and and military man. Very popular. Only real drawback was his proslavery sentiments... tried but failed to get the Northwest Ordinance's ban on the expansion of slavery into new US territory repealed. Enter, John Tyler, a shit of a politician and not much better of a human being. His Ascendency stole the presidency after Harrison's oddly timed death from "illness" only 31 days after being inaugurated. Tyler should have never been President. Technically, under the Constitution, he never was President. As VP he was to act as president until a new president was elected. That was the text of Article II Section 1. It didn't say "the VP BECOMES president for the remainder of the term." A new election should have taken place, with Tyler acting as president until a new president chosen by the Electors. Some challenged his move, yet nobody pushed enough to prevent it. Problem was that Constitution was somewhat ambiguous as to what exactly was to happen. Tyler took advantage of it. Tyler was Calhounian promoter of the concept of state sovereignty in objection to the Constitution's system of duel sovereignty. Wanted president to have more power than Congress. Pushed for Texas to be added "manifest destiny", in large part, to expand slavery and the Virginian/southern aristocratic plantation system. Supported Polk. Got Texas. Got the Mexican War. Spread of slavery. All dominos towards the Rebellion of 1860, of which Tyler aligned with the traitors. Dare I say that Tippicannoe's death was quite good timing for the rise of the pro-slavery forces... coincidence? 🤔

1
MAGAdeburger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Every time I see the Navy hospital ships that never housed a single "covid" patient, despite the DeAdliEsT PanDeMiC eVeR, I can't help but wonder if they had been deployed for other purposes? Mobile command posts... Space Force is within the constitutional brach of the Navy after all. How better to conceal covert ops?

1
MAGAdeburger 1 point ago +1 / -0

No doubt Trump has been acting and playing a role this whole time. What makes his performance so bizarre (or great) is the bouncing back and forth between "sides." Painted himself as a "true conservative" yet has always been a social liberal and continued that while in office, yet so many social conservatives tolerated it. Says he's going to put Hillary in jail, yet crickets, at least so far. Wall? Lots of broken promises, failed efforts and flipflopping. Ended up being the politician he claimed he never was... how many fail to remember that unlike true statesmen, all politicians are actors.

So again the question remains, was and is Trump being inconsistent because it was an act to confuse the hell out of everyone, bring all the media attention on him, cause TDS 24/7 for the left and Trump cult of personality for [some of] the right, so that the military operation could do real work behind the scenes while the world rubbernecks, OR like Shiva apparently believes, Trump was always DS and an attempt to con the right (a la Cobert Report)?

OR is Shiva just now acting, playing the turncourt, former Trump supporter, so that more on the left, the real Trump haters, will take Shiva's real mission to expose election fraud more seriously?

1
MAGAdeburger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dare I say... "The Ascension"? I can think of somebody greater breaking an even larger "arena" (matrix etc) controlled by even stronger, more evil enemy, the father of lies himself

view more: Next ›