Here's a more detailed explanation. A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.
-
The Quo Warranto has to be filled at the US District Court for the District of Columbia.
-
Heres the link to the law https://code.dccouncil.us/dc/council/code/titles/16/chapters/35/#:~:text=A%20quo%20warranto%20may%20be,public%20office%20of%20the%20United
-
It's a civil trial by jury and the evidence is shown during by both parties.
-
If we win the trial, they just rule Bidens Win Null and Void and would erase his win completely. And Trump continues to be president.
Here's a good article explaining it . https://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2021/01/19/the-maga-counterpunch-is-quo-warranto-in-dc-district-court-show-the-receipts-of-election-fraud/
And here is a 9th circuit court of appeals decision on it. They tried to use it on Obama but didn't have any receipts. https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20111222260#
Here's a California state link explaining how Quo Warranto is supposed to be used and not to be used
what does he have to lose....at least the evidence gets presented.....
and it does start with a 'Q'
Who or what court would bother to attempt this? Based on the last few months, probably none would even consider it. Trump was abandoned.
Texas seems ornery enough to try, but I don't think this will happen.
Right now it's the us attorney that ok'd the doj to drop charges on Flynn. He's the one that decides. Even if he refuses there's a way to bypass that.
Liberal website law fare actually wrote an article on how the Quo Warranto could be used if trump didn't leave today.