GET THE FUCK IN HERE PEDES I THINK I FOUND SOMETHING
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (294)
sorted by:
You know, I keep saying here that many take absolutely everything as a "Its a sign!!!" If someone at Mar-a-Lago farts tomorrow in a specific way I bet a bunch of people will claim "Its a sign!' and find a drop to match it. 100-1 bet.
I would not be here if a number of drops and confirmations didn't make me a believer in Q. But I also treat every "Its a sign!" with caution, doesn't matter if something matches some drop rather well, I still do a good dose of research for my own good and sanity (main reason I treat all the false prophets so many listen to in video feeds as charlatans and lying cheats any time I hear one utter "Insurrection Act has been invoked").
Not everything "matches a drop", nor should it. And this "When does a bird sing?" drop, while I get the implication, could easily fit a number of events. I have no idea why so many insisted that it doesn't matter if owls sing or not, because damn it, ITS A SIGN!!!
I understand the hopium and finding something to sustain it, last few days and today specifically are too hard to take for my wife and me, but we all should be rather selective in what is a "sign". Huma showing up today is precisely the proof that HUMA did NOT sing, nor was she locked up until now. IMHO, of course, and to my long trained analytical mind. Had she been singing in the past 2 years we would not be seeing her tweeting (singing) today.
You have somewhat of a point. However, if that someone at Mar-a-logo (building on your crass example) turns out to have indeed sharted, made a Q in their undies, while eating 2 scoops of ice-cream, and it was at exactly 17:45 ... how many coincidences until it's impossible?
There's a difference between grasping at straws and checking with open eyes for confirmation. The prevalent attitude here seems to have a healthy amount of skepticism once all facts are considered ... but does not blindly close their eyes before all data is gathered. Q's early drops/proofs taught them that.
I would recommend reading said drops to learn for yourself how to discern the signal from the noise; oftentimes just noticing the oddity for others to carry forth can be helpful too.
this
Been doing serious analysis and code for the Fortune 50 for over 40 years now, maybe longer than most on this site are alive. No need to tell me how to do serious analysis, otherwise I wouldn't be here after my own analysis of drops and confirmations led me to find and join this place.
My apologies then. I've been a little rough given the flak from all the hand-shake accounts today.
Huma is a really big lead in the drops that I personally had written off as a dead-end; I'm quite shocked to see it resurrect.