There is quite a large amount of evidence indicating fraud. Ask yourself why no-one in the system wants a court to examine it.
Note I didn't say proof, that is for the court to decide, but only if they allow a case to proceed - or are you ok with denying trials because the MSM keep telling porkies?
Or... John Epstein Island Roberts tells them how to vote, again? They decide the plaintiff doesn't have standing, or that the case was submitted too late to have any effect on the matter? ( There's a legal term for that, I forget what it is. laudes? laeches? ) Maybe the SC ignoring the fraud is the point when the military makes the national security call and steps in? Not sure, it doesn't seem like a big enough demonstration that everything's compromised, to me.
No fraud? ?
There is quite a large amount of evidence indicating fraud. Ask yourself why no-one in the system wants a court to examine it.
Note I didn't say proof, that is for the court to decide, but only if they allow a case to proceed - or are you ok with denying trials because the MSM keep telling porkies?
Or... John Epstein Island Roberts tells them how to vote, again? They decide the plaintiff doesn't have standing, or that the case was submitted too late to have any effect on the matter? ( There's a legal term for that, I forget what it is. laudes? laeches? ) Maybe the SC ignoring the fraud is the point when the military makes the national security call and steps in? Not sure, it doesn't seem like a big enough demonstration that everything's compromised, to me.