It is taken by all federal employees, and this specific wording was established in 1966. This was the swearing in of national guard units as US marshals.
Again, this is NOT a military oath, and has nothing to do with chain of command. The wording used is 100% in compliance with the code established in 1966. Every federal employee takes this exact same oath.
I have looked further into this and have to concede that you are correct in this regard.
In my research, I did come across some interesting facts with regards to duties, jurisdictions, and interoperability. But that will be a subject for another post.
Thank you, Anon, for standing up for truth in this matter.
Question. Have you researched any modifications of the Marshalls Oath since its formation? I enjoy history quite a bit and would be interested in any of your findings as there have been several evolutions of the US Marshall service throughout the years.
This is not a military oath guys. Please, enough of us are hurting already that we don't need these kinds of false rumors started.
This is the standard oath defined in 5 USC 3331 for all government employees
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title5/html/USCODE-2011-title5-partIII-subpartB-chap33-subchapII-sec3331.htm
It is taken by all federal employees, and this specific wording was established in 1966. This was the swearing in of national guard units as US marshals.
Again, this is NOT a military oath, and has nothing to do with chain of command. The wording used is 100% in compliance with the code established in 1966. Every federal employee takes this exact same oath.
Lol. Yes, let's just listen to what our goverment has to say about it, shall we? Dude, that's how we all got screwed in the first place.
Here is a source from the Military itself. The first and last entries are the relevant oaths.
https://history.army.mil/html/faq/oaths.html
Again. This was an oath for US marshal. Not a military oath. The oath they read is exactly the oath mandated by 5 USC 3331.
The military oaths have nothing to do with this. This wording is standard since 1966. Please see here:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title5/html/USCODE-2011-title5-partIII-subpartB-chap33-subchapII-sec3331.htm
I have looked further into this and have to concede that you are correct in this regard.
In my research, I did come across some interesting facts with regards to duties, jurisdictions, and interoperability. But that will be a subject for another post.
Thank you, Anon, for standing up for truth in this matter.
Question. Have you researched any modifications of the Marshalls Oath since its formation? I enjoy history quite a bit and would be interested in any of your findings as there have been several evolutions of the US Marshall service throughout the years.
https://www.usmarshals.gov/history/broad_range.htm
https://www.usmarshals.gov/duties/factsheets/index.html