I have looked further into this and have to concede that you are correct in this regard.
In my research, I did come across some interesting facts with regards to duties, jurisdictions, and interoperability. But that will be a subject for another post.
Thank you, Anon, for standing up for truth in this matter.
I am considering it. But there is a lot of good information here, the process of research and peer review, how to properly fact check,, how to concede a point, where to go for research, a better awareness of what's in play, and even some good tidbits from history. Im reluctant to remove the post for these reasons.
I am considering it. But there is a lot of good information here, the process of research and peer review, how to properly fact check,, how to concede a point, where to go for research, a enter awareness of what's in play, and even some good tidbit from history. Im reluctant to remove the post for these reasons.
I am considering it. But there is a lot of good information here, the process of research and peer review, how to properly fact check,, how to concede a point, where to go for research, a enter awareness of what's in play, and even some good tidbit from history. Im reluctant to remove the post for these reasons.
Question. Have you researched any modifications of the Marshalls Oath since its formation? I enjoy history quite a bit and would be interested in any of your findings as there have been several evolutions of the US Marshall service throughout the years.
Lol. Yes, let's just listen to what our goverment has to say about it, shall we? Dude, that's how we all got screwed in the first place.
Here is a source from the Military itself. The first and last entries are the relevant oaths.
https://history.army.mil/html/faq/oaths.html
Again. This was an oath for US marshal. Not a military oath. The oath they read is exactly the oath mandated by 5 USC 3331.
The military oaths have nothing to do with this. This wording is standard since 1966. Please see here:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title5/html/USCODE-2011-title5-partIII-subpartB-chap33-subchapII-sec3331.htm
I have looked further into this and have to concede that you are correct in this regard.
In my research, I did come across some interesting facts with regards to duties, jurisdictions, and interoperability. But that will be a subject for another post.
Thank you, Anon, for standing up for truth in this matter.
I am considering it. But there is a lot of good information here, the process of research and peer review, how to properly fact check,, how to concede a point, where to go for research, a better awareness of what's in play, and even some good tidbits from history. Im reluctant to remove the post for these reasons.
A title edit ability would be helpful here.
I am considering it. But there is a lot of good information here, the process of research and peer review, how to properly fact check,, how to concede a point, where to go for research, a enter awareness of what's in play, and even some good tidbit from history. Im reluctant to remove the post for these reasons.
I am considering it. But there is a lot of good information here, the process of research and peer review, how to properly fact check,, how to concede a point, where to go for research, a enter awareness of what's in play, and even some good tidbit from history. Im reluctant to remove the post for these reasons.
A title edit ability would be helpful here.
Question. Have you researched any modifications of the Marshalls Oath since its formation? I enjoy history quite a bit and would be interested in any of your findings as there have been several evolutions of the US Marshall service throughout the years.
https://www.usmarshals.gov/history/broad_range.htm
https://www.usmarshals.gov/duties/factsheets/index.html