that explicitly states non-Q supporters aren't allowed, regardless of if they want to civilly discuss things. either the rule should be changed, or this is an echo chamber
It is not an echo chamber. If this was about Harry Potter and people wanted to keep discussing Lord of the Rings, they would be shown the door.
This is for discussions about Q drops and news that is relatable to Q, not whether or not we think Q is legit. Those days are over. If you want to discuss that, there are places you can go.
There is a difference between name calling and a well formed argument and counter argument.
Calling names isn't an argument.
No one here is suggesting that challenging ideas should be banned. That is encouraged. I love playing devil's advocate.
Name calling and "you were so stupid to believe that!" isn't an argument.
that explicitly states non-Q supporters aren't allowed, regardless of if they want to civilly discuss things. either the rule should be changed, or this is an echo chamber
If you don't support Q you should be fine bring here asking questions as long as you aren't being an asshole
i agree with that sentiment, but that's not what the rule says. i think it should be changed to only ban trolls/assholes
True that'd be a better report option, we're on the same page ?
It is not an echo chamber. If this was about Harry Potter and people wanted to keep discussing Lord of the Rings, they would be shown the door.
This is for discussions about Q drops and news that is relatable to Q, not whether or not we think Q is legit. Those days are over. If you want to discuss that, there are places you can go.
Thanks for playing.
IDK--what, at this point, isn't it pretty well proved that Q isn't legit? Or is that what u meant?
What proved that Q isn't legit? Your lack of pattern recognition and understanding of silent warfare?
You must be new. Or a spook.
That's rich coming from safespace-r-us.