A lot of guys seem to base their opinions on Donald Trump and what he has done or is doing... and by being Q+, DJT is the main part of Q....
To think that and still follow Q is a fundamental misunderstanding of Q and what Q has posted....
The Q team is an extension of a pre-Trump strategy.... of course, there’s no doubt that DJT is aware of Q and the team or certainly members of it....
But THE PLAN as we follow it from the beginning of Q, has very little to do with President Trump... though he did facilitate particular parts of that PLAN.. no doubt for me anyway..
You might call him a figurehead, but this whole PLAN is not dependent on DJT and in all likelihood DJT probably only knows part of that plan... in terms of an overview but not in terms of running it or THE PLAN..
To make such a link is missing the majority of what Q has posted in respect of THE PLAN...
JUST BECAUSE PRESIDENT TRUMP IS NO LONGER IN OFFICE HAS LITTLE TO NO BEARING ON THE PLAN OR THE STRATEGY WE ARE WATCHING PLAY OUT....
WWG1WGA
PS Apologies for the caps lock on THE PLAN... I am hoping by doing so that anyone reading this will understand that there has only ever been one PLAN.... it hasn’t changed it is still on course (until proven otherwise) but to think that President Trump being out of office is a failure of THE PLAN.... it is not... not by a long shot.... indeed just thinking about it logically and specifically in respect to the presidential election there were a 101 ways that DJT could have fought and fought much harder than he did to suggest this is by ANY MEANS over..
Why shouldn't you see that the United States must fight a winning battle? Why should you not see that this is a battle worth fighting? Letting the world be in an endless loop of indecision means that nothing becomes inevitable. We can't fight this by sitting on our hands. As Q put it, the world is on fire. What's the point in fighting that if it burns for ever? When it boils over, they will fight like the enemy. And if they win, they will be able to say we won. That will be enough. They might just give the orders to bomb the people, and it won't be the United States. The United States' job is to protect the world. And what was he saying earlier? That the United States should do its own thing? Why should we do our own thing? When the world is on fire, the enemy can't stand back. It is at war with itself. Let them burn. It means the world can't continue on. And the world might as well burn. Why do they need to burn? Just because they can't, they start fighting. No reason. They're trying to end the world. But let's not forget. As an opponent, what they are going to do is not only destroy their country, but the world. The world needs destruction, not just for the sake of the world. They have to fight in that way because the United States, with what we have, can't survive. So, instead of fighting the world, they are fighting each other. I'm saying they are at war with themselves. So just so we can be sure that the United States is not the enemy, let's make war between ourselves. That's what they need, to make war with each other. Like the soldiers who took a napkin to the soldiers who took a life. But if a napkin goes to their enemy's life, like killing every man, woman, and child of a country, how can the government stand against the soldiers? All the soldiers are Americans. They are our partners. Don't just do it for their sake. Do it for ours. It's our government. Our children's. Because we need a war. A war for our right to live. We need a war for our right to own as much as they do. We need a war for a right to life. For a right to live. We do not want the war. We just want to live! But if that war happens, what else do they do? If that war happens, what else do they do? That's just as much their country is doing.