1384 days from now, it will be 11.4 (2024) not only does to lead to Q post 1384 which is a mindblower, and NOT ONLY is this day after election day in 2024, BUT 11.4 comes after 11.3 from the DoD Manual (Obviously). If you're up to date on info, you'd know that 11.3 is the first marker to look for. let me copy paste what section 11.4 says below This looks very much like it relates to the temporary military occupancy of DC.
11.4 LEGAL POSITION OF THE OCCUPYING POWER Military occupation of enemy territory involves a complicated, trilateral set of legal relations between the Occupying Power, the temporarily ousted sovereign authority, and the inhabitants of occupied territory.92 The fact of occupation gives the Occupying Power the right to govern enemy territory temporarily, but does not transfer sovereignty over occupied territory to the Occupying Power.
11.4.1 Right of the Occupying Power to Govern the Enemy Territory Temporarily. The right to govern the territory of the enemy during its military occupation is one of the incidents of war. By the fact of occupation (i.e., the Occupying Power’s established power over occupied territory),* the Occupying Power is conferred the authority to exercise some of the rights of sovereignty. The exercise of these sovereign rights also results from the necessity of maintaining law and order, indispensable both to the inhabitants and to the occupying force, and the failure or inability of the legitimate government to exercise its functions, or the undesirability of allowing it to do so.
11.4.2 Limitations on the Power of the Occupying Power Stemming From Its Lack of Sovereignty Over Occupied Territory. Belligerent occupation in a foreign war, being based upon the possession of enemy territory, necessarily implies that the sovereignty of the occupied territory is not vested in the Occupying Power. Occupation is essentially provisional. Because sovereignty is not vested in the Occupying Power, the fact of military occupation does not authorize the Occupying Power to take certain actions. For example, the Occupying Power is not authorized by the fact of belligerent occupation to annex occupied territory or to create a new State. In addition, the Occupying Power may not compel the inhabitants of occupied territory to become its nationals or otherwise to swear allegiance to it. Similarly, in view of the provisional nature of belligerent occupation, the authority of the Occupying Power under occupation law has been interpreted as being subject to limitations on the ability of the Occupying Power to alter institutions of government permanently or change the constitution of a country.
https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/law_war_manual15.pdf Pompeo Tweet: https://twitter.com/mikepompeo/status/1352274074886680579
The power isn't Trumps but rather that of the executive. He just normally is the senior member of that branch. Since his term is up let's go through the succession:
1
PresidentTerm is up, Biden is illegitimate2
Vice PresidentTerm is up, Harris is illegitimate3
President Pro Tempore of the SenateNeeds to be voted on, hasn't, that vote wouldn't be legitimate anyways due to treasonous voters (ie treasonous senators)4 Secretary of State - Mike Pompeo
5 Secretary of Defense - Christopher Miller
SoS doesn't have a term limit, they persist until replaced. And if Biden is illegitimate then his picks are as well. So Pompeo is still the Secretary of State. (And if not Pompeo, then next up is SoD)
So if The military DOES make a move, It is Pompeo's (or Miller's) shoulders that the duty to head the Executive would fall on (whether he wanted it or not) and he would be the man to ensure EOs were put in motion.
(is my thinking)
You really think it will stop the cabal from Super Spreader announced as (fake) POTUS? They have been pissing on the Constitution for decades now, and also now have full support of GOPe in Commigress. Who's going to challenge that?