Well MSDNC used screenshots of “The Donald” presenting an image of patriots plotting a violent siege on the Capitol with goals to harm “leaders.” And we know from the Mueller Report that the FBI uses MSM reports as “evidence.” Because that’s all our trillion dollar defense budget can afford.
I know some field agents and these guys have gobs of common sense. But they are compartmentalized. Good men (and women) in a corrupt bureaucracy.
Going along to get along in a corrupt, criminal bureaucracy makes you just as corrupt as the criminals who run it. Good people have two options. You either become a whistleblower or GTFO.
yes, exactly -- for people who have information, testimony, and evidence. but the compartmentalization effectively blocks this from many individuals. you could accuse them of being willfully ignorant, but that would require them to get their information about their agency from the outside, or risk "researching" their colleagues on the inside just out of curiosity - and that is not professional conduct.
Well MSDNC used screenshots of “The Donald” presenting an image of patriots plotting a violent siege on the Capitol with goals to harm “leaders.” And we know from the Mueller Report that the FBI uses MSM reports as “evidence.” Because that’s all our trillion dollar defense budget can afford.
I know some field agents and these guys have gobs of common sense. But they are compartmentalized. Good men (and women) in a corrupt bureaucracy.
Can anyone confirm if this site had or has a Canary Clause posted anywhere?
No canary anywhere...
Going along to get along in a corrupt, criminal bureaucracy makes you just as corrupt as the criminals who run it. Good people have two options. You either become a whistleblower or GTFO.
yes, exactly -- for people who have information, testimony, and evidence. but the compartmentalization effectively blocks this from many individuals. you could accuse them of being willfully ignorant, but that would require them to get their information about their agency from the outside, or risk "researching" their colleagues on the inside just out of curiosity - and that is not professional conduct.