Dan Scavino posted this on his story 25 min ago, what’s everyone’s take?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (206)
sorted by:
I can only assume this is a reference to the national debt. If the United States wants to default on its debt, it can of course do so. That doesn't require the existing system of law to be thrown out. Nor are any of these eccentric claims about admiralty law, etc. necessary.
Not eccentric bro. Look it the fuck up. People have been discussing admiralty law for decades and every time it gets traction there’s a ton of numbnuts that say the same thing you just did.
Yes, it's eccentric. It's a strange theory that has nothing to do with how the courts actually operate, as sovereign citizens find out to their dismay every time they attempt to invoke this nonsense in court.
I'm actually decently familiar with actual admiralty law - you know, the sort that is operative in maritime contexts. You, on the other hand, have presumably never cracked open a law review in your life.
The general courts in the United States do not operate under admiralty law; they operate under the standard system, which incorporates the inherited common law with statute law and the Constitution. This 'admiralty law' nonsense is uniformly rejected by the courts. You can believe it, but you'll be frustrated time and time again when the things you think should happen don't happen, because our legal system dismisses your sentiments as fringe nonsense.