Dan Scavino posted this on his story 25 min ago, what’s everyone’s take?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (206)
sorted by:
Yes, because of course if we are saying the courts are running under admiralty law, to justify their overreach and confiscation of our $$$ via statutes, ordinances, and sanctions, they are going to say "you got it, you solved the riddle! Here's all your parking ticket and speeding fines back. Heres your permit fees to put a toilet in your basement back. Sorry, no hard feelings, huh?"
Since that has not happened, then this is all just made up nonsense.
I have no idea why you think the courts are running under 'admiralty law'. Nothing about the system of law in general effect, which combines the common law tradition we share with Britain and some commonwealth countries with statute law and the Constitution has much to do with admiralty law.
By definition, statutory law is... statute law.
I don't think you understand what admiralty law is.