Occam's Razor would basically be accepting what MSM tells us. Occam's Razor can only apply when comparing competing theories under the assumption that all parties believe in Q. Need to compare apples to other apples and not with oranges, if that makes any sense, with apples being the competing theories.
Occam's Razor would basically be accepting what MSM tells us. Occam's Razor can only apply when comparing competing theories under the assumption that all parties believe in Q. Need to compare apples to other apples and not with oranges, if that makes any sense, with apples being the competing theories.
agreed. you can't quickly red pill him with 0deltas between posts and tweets to basically express a give that q is real.
then you can argue based on competing narratives.
would like to know more details of the argument. it's interesting.