I'm requesting advice from the old-timers regarding topics on this board NOT promoted/mentioned by Q. I apologize for the long post but I think this is important for those who are in my same predicament regarding Q-research vs conspiracy theories that harm our noble goals.
I retired from a 60 hr/wk job at the beginning of 2020. COVID hit w/in a couple of weeks and I was pissed that a lot of my plans were ruined. I had a feeling COVID was a hoax so I started researching COVID specifically since I had a lot of free time. I heard mention of "Q" a couple of times in 2019 but had no idea what "Q" was. Fast forward to 2020 and I start running across videos on YouTube that mention Q. Ahhh..OK. I branched into watching a lot of those as well. I ended up getting red-pilled too quickly but after a few weeks I started thinking...some of these people in the videos are full of shit.
I shut off YouTube, quit going to all the kook sites, grabbed a notebook, and started reading all the Q-drops from #1-present day while researching the drops specifically and taking notes. Then it all clicked. I soon confirmed to myself that many of the people making those videos never read a damn thing Q said or grossly misinterpreted/embellished things. I could see the big picture overall. I did not need or care so much about proofs, dates, etc. If anything, the Q-drops presented themselves to me as one bad-ass study guide about why things are the way they are. Cool.
I could not use social media for the past twenty years. I was a cop and my former Sheriff had a team of snitches that would actually search out employees' Facebooks and social media and then discipline them for "inappropriate comments" or even "liking" someone else's comment that they deemed "inappropriate". (Remember that old Planet of the Apes meme that looked like Valerie Jarrett? My buddy ended up on the local news and was suspended for several months for clicking "like" on that meme b/c they said it was "racist".) I can't keep my mouth shut so I never participated in any forum or social media until very recently. I am thankful I stayed away from social media for most of my life b/c I soon realized how retarded and gullible many people can be. Especially the group-thinkers. I would seriously be dooming right now otherwise.
B/c I researched the Q-drops independently, my brain was not corrupted by everyone's "hopium", "doom", and other dumb shit. B/c of this, I have no doubt the Biden Admin will be short for this earth. I don't care about the timeline, Q pointed me in the right direction, I researched, I know Q will sometimes purposely give misinfo, and I feel Trump/Q made the right moves that will eventually make everything right. No problem there. I got the 40,000 foot view and I have felt I was months ahead of any news outlet to the point I cringed when they finally reported on something that many of us had known forever. (And I have only been researching Q for about a year now.) Yall get the point.
Here's my problem. I need some advice from the old-timers that have been around from the beginning or earlier:
B/c I looked at Q primarily through my own research and never actively participated in forums, chans, kun, etc., I was surprised to see a lot of people on this board talking about the same fantastical things that Q never ever mentions, or if Q mentions it at all, it is rather vague. Here are a few examples:
NESARA/GESARA: This crowd always goes on about the utopia to come. I have never seen Q mention it once. Q mentioned the gold standard coming back. Q hints at making the banking system less centralized and more fair. I never saw a single drop mention NES/GES. All those NES/GES sites either try to sell you gold & silver and/or have a New Age theme to them. My observations/pattern recognition. Am I missing something obvious?
The latest one I have seen popping back up with a vengeance around here is the CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES crowd. Almost 5,000 drops and I never heard Q mention this one time. Q mentions the Vatican / City of London / DC. Sure. But not "ADMIRALITY LAW" and "CONSTITUTION OF EIGHTEEN-SEVENTYwhatever". I ran across it a few times early on while researching other stuff. What I noticed is 5 different people/articles/vids will give you ten different explanations. I see Q constantly posting about restoring the Constitution but never about this stuff. These sites usually don't have the New Age themes as much but they still try to sell you some precious metals. Am I missing something obvious?
I have seen a lot of people claiming to be "Q-supporters/podcasters" talking about miracle medicinal cure-alls and regeneration machines. (When Trump gets back in we will have no more cancer on earth.) When the f*ck did Q mention this? Did I miss something? Q hinted that RBG might have been kept alive longer by medicines not available to the public. Q even mentioned (I believe) the possibility of eventually seeing alternative advanced forms of energy. Q even vaguely hinted at extra-terrestrial life but only because of the vastness of the universe. Nothing specific. However, I see a bunch of people falling for the Robert David Steele types. I like to keep an eye on some of these guys and I'll force myself to watch some of their videos. Amongst a lot of other BS, Steele once claimed that we are sending kids to Mars on a "twenty year ride" to work as off-planet slaves. Really? Come on. Don't even get me started on all those YouTubers/podcasters (including Steele) that constantly have inside info and "un-named sources". That shit pisses me off and I see people fall for it left and right. My friend sent me a Simon Parks vid recently and I instantly sent him back the "alien mother" vid with the reply: "Really. You believe this guy?"
For you long-time researchers (Q-researchers), am I way off here or are some people just gullible and/or filled on too much "hopium"? On one hand I feel my personal research benefited by not engaging much in forums/chans/social media. It certainly helped me not to fall into the "doomer crowd". I quickly realized that if lot of those "doomers" read even a fraction of Q's posts, they would be feeling pretty good right now. On the other hand, did I do myself a disservice by going out of my way to avoid the opinions of others?
Disclaimer In no way am I attacking this forum. There are a lot of really bright folks on here. It just seems that for every nugget of gold, I end up running across 10 pounds of sh*t. :) I'm all in on the plan. I just think it would help if more people actually read it.
Thoughts?
Having the opportunity to read every drop and find your own understanding from that exercise is invaluable.
Trying to understand a situation when provided some information can often lead to the discovery of additional information that adds context and meaning to things previously not understood.
I am trying to understand why you, and many people who have commented here, have looked at the Corporation of the United States with abject cynicism. I have done some research into the corporation and thus far, I have not found any information that undermines or counters the facts that have been presented by various sources (including previous litigations).
In my experience research based on given clues, often leads to information previously unknown. I have come to understand that is to be expected, the fact that no one mentioned it before is exactly the reason the research was necessary. The known narrative supports the present understanding. With new information comes a fuller and more complete understanding, perhaps one that some would rather people not have.
Is it just that Q did not explicitly state that a Corp. exists that makes you dubious of the same? Is it the scant amount of information available on the internet?
I am just trying to understand, based on reason and logic, why something that is supported by facts found in statues and seemingly explains much of what has occurred that previously went unexplained or superficially explained, is dismissed by so many.
Has anyone, anyone, found information that demonstrates unquestionably that the United States Corporation was not formed, and is some fable told ... for whatever reason?
If not, isn't it worth exploring until an answer is found, and if no answer can be found, at least until all avenues of research are exhausted?
That people try to monetize their sites in theme with their understandings does not per se undermine the value of the information. I think everyone can agree gold/silver has value, it's not like they are trying to sell air, or pet rocks. I mean, why does the promotion of an actual valuable commodity on the same site that provides seemingly new information make you, or those who have posted similar doubt in comments, dubious of the said information?
To add on to this, the USA INC. is not new news in any regard. It's just not popping up into peoples conciseness now, and I think it's taking people by surprise/the wrong way because they've believed so hard in the America they thought they knew.
It would like be going on Reddit and posting some information from 4chan, while it might correct information, the level of consciousness on Reddit is generally lower than of places like 4chan or 8kun so they will mock and ridicule it because they haven't heard it before.
USA INC. goes deeper as well on the "person" existing in the USA.
Why is your name on your license ALL CAPS?! Ever wondered? Why do we even have drivers license? Did you know you don't technically need one? The white speed limit you see on the side of the rode only applies to "commercial drivers". Why do you need a license if you are not a commercial driver? Are you an Uber driver, a delivery person, or a 18 wheeler driver delivering stuff? If not, then you not need one because you have the right to freely travel as long as you are not doing commerce.
You also do not need to pay taxes, but we have been tricked into it just like getting a license. Look at a dollar bill, on one side you have the US FEDERAL RESERVE stamp, on the other US TREASURY stamp.
You can get your paychecks paid to you in "lawful money" by choosing a side instead of getting a direct deposit you can have all of your earnings given to you tax free. You are not obligated to pay taxes. Look up your state and find the clause where you can get paid in "lawful money".
For example: AZ Statute 23-353(C)
I could go on and on about this stuff, might make a full write up as a post
Further exploration never harmed anyone. The opposite has been the de facto case and how we ended up in this debacle.
I don’t have a problem with the US CORP theory so much as the huge reemergence of the the topic around the time Biden got inaugurated. I have read it before. I have no problem if it turned out to be true. I don’t look into or disregard things based on whether Q mentioned it or not. I just saw the topic coming back in a big way all of a sudden.
Some might call it ... an awakening ?
Qcumber, Bravo! That was the most diplomatic response to OP cognitive bias I have ever read.