<------- This many people think the inauguration was fake
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
I think it’s just a matter of being blocked by someone.
So bigger picture, you have to ask “why” would there need to be multiple takes of a fake inauguration and then mix clips, etc., in order to support this concept. And I don’t see a plausible reason.
The best theory I could use to support a “fake” event is security, where they would choose to run a dress rehearsal, record that for the “real” broadcast, then sub body doubles on stage that only people saw at a distance. But all of that is still just unreasonable, because it would make sense just to tighten security. I’m not buying the whole “fake inauguration” thing at all. Now if Q posts today and says “It was all fake” or something, then yeah, let’s discuss.
I think it’s taking our energy and focus off the real story: where are all the people with the proof and when will it come to light? No more press conferences by Giuliani, Powell, Lindell, Flynn, etc.... I started a thread on it (“Where is Tony Bobulinksi” for discussion but little input so far.) Let’s talk about what we KNOW and what Q and Q+ have told us. We have it all. We caught them. NCSWIC