Hello fellow patriots (imagine me holding a skateboard and looking a lot like Steve Buscemi)...
With a joke out of the way, let's get serious. I'm a newfag around here, only started really looking at Q seriously last week or so. I'm a LONG time /r/the_donald, TDW, and now PW member and I always saw Q as a dangerous larp. I was badmouthing you all very recently (which you can see in my history), so I won't pretend to be one of you just yet. However, in the last few weeks, I realized that I had no real evidence or basis for that belief, so I decided to check it out for myself. I started listening to X22, RedPill78, reading a ton of posts here, and digging further.
Well, I think y'all are on to something here, so I'm staying around to learn more.
However... I noticed something that may be damaging to this site and how PW and normies see us, and that is a LOT of confirmation bias since the inauguration.
Let me use an example: the fake oval office. First of all, I'm onboard with the idea that the inauguration MAY have been pre-recorded and faked. None of us know for a fact. However, having read a ton of posts here about it I see confirmation bias everywhere. People are regurgitating what others have SPECULATED as evidence to support their own jump to conclusions.
Given that I don't have the wealth of Q knowledge that you all do here, my instinct is to apply logic rather than look for specific Q posts to explain what I'm seeing. Let's take the painting in the oval office as an example. Many are saying that because the paintings match, Biden was in the Castle Rock studio. But why can't it be the other way? In order to make a realistic set, Castle Rock put the same painting on their set as was in the real oval office. Furthermore, one of our mods pointed out (https://greatawakening.win/p/11SJoc4pqJ/x/c/4DvmPdkcCnN) that the same painting was in the real oval office during Trump's presidency, but nobody has accepted that fact because it goes against what we all want to believe to be true.
So, I think we all have to take a step back, take a breath, and try to be logical. You're all research machines, your autism is honestly mind-boggling and I'm super impressed. But we're all running super hot right now, emotions are high, and as a result I think we're jumping to said conclusions prematurely. We ALL want them to be true, but let's not act like the media portrays us to be, alright?
Edit: from one of the comments below, more proof about the office being legit that looks plausible to me: https://media.greatawakening.win/post/NY0qZ4H3.jpeg
Thank you for reading.
I'm much like you.
I'm someone watching far on the sideline. I'm neither American or live in America. I'm from Sweden and haven't had that big of a political interest until some 2- 3 years ago when I felt like what the Swedish media told me did not match up with my actual experiences (long story short, over-immigration is affecting our country in a very bad way,) and America affects our country a lot. Before Trump, Sweden was going down (and still is holding on to) this very twisted far-left belief with men being women and women being men (people are free to do whatever they want with themselves but to force these things on us who don't believe it is too much,) to the point that if you actually have the wrong political belief, you lose your job, no joke. People lose their jobs over disagreeing with immigration policies and disagreeing over transmatter issues.
I got into the Q-theory not long ago at all, perhaps a week ago at most through the Swedish free-speech forum called Flashback.org.
It very much sounds like a fiction at first, like a cool story but "too good/unreal to be true."
But the more I read into it, the more I start to see what people were getting at, and I can say that a lot of what I've seen actually has been pretty mindboggling. Something just isn't right.
However, that goes both ways. I also feel a bit critical towards other types of theories.
Some things I feel is a bit over the top is the whole "cabal are satanistic, blood drinking pedophiles," it's like (if we assume this is all fiction) the writer wanted to have the absolute worst possible type of villain there is, to the point it became over the top. I would, if so, have fallen for the narrative more if it was more like human-trafficking pedophiles, moneygrubbers, etc, but blood drinking and Satanistic?
It becomes a very obvious religious narrative, a religious battle. I can understand this is America, and America is very religious, so a religious narrative will catch people's attention more.
But as someone, like me, from Sweden, who is not religious whatsoever, that narrative feels... strange and almost forced because it was a way to easier catch the attention of Christians. Of course as a Christian you'd want the Evil gone, the Satan worshipping bastards out of the picture and reclaim the glory to the one and only God.
But as said, someone outside that religious belief, it becomes a bit too much.
I will be honest that I don't buy the Q-theory that much, it's just something that too good to be true, and I've grown up learning that nothing can be too good to be true, but I happily wish to be proven wrong.
If the Q-theory is fake, it is what it is. But I would urge all of you to not falter because of it, if it turns out to be fake.. You all got a strong bond.
If the Q-theory is true, the American people have my best wishes, even if I can't do anything being in a far-away country.