Well in that case the world is flat. Because it could all be faked. Just because something can happen doesn't mean that it did.
Let's really think for a second here. Are we going to assume that he gets into office and immediately goes, let's change the carpet, nothing else, just the carpet and these pictures. Now let's get to business and grab a camera, I wanna sign these 17 executive orders and show these people I mean business, but first the carpet.
You are proving my point bro. You are saying this is proof but tons of stuff isn't the same. We know that there are 9 replica white houses in the world. We know that there are a ton of replica oval offices in the world. So for you to say Proof when it isn't proof is a shill thing to do bro. I realize you have the best of intentions, but the road to hell is paved with those. Why do you think they can put a tree in the back that can look the same, but not the rest of it. Proof is uncertain, I would say gives reason for suspicion.
Well in that case the world is flat. Because it could all be faked. Just because something can happen doesn't mean that it did.
Let's really think for a second here. Are we going to assume that he gets into office and immediately goes, let's change the carpet, nothing else, just the carpet and these pictures. Now let's get to business and grab a camera, I wanna sign these 17 executive orders and show these people I mean business, but first the carpet.
OH so now you are saying they changed a bunch of stuff. so you didn't mean proof. You meant some reason to be suspicious. Retitle it or your a shill.
You are proving my point bro. You are saying this is proof but tons of stuff isn't the same. We know that there are 9 replica white houses in the world. We know that there are a ton of replica oval offices in the world. So for you to say Proof when it isn't proof is a shill thing to do bro. I realize you have the best of intentions, but the road to hell is paved with those. Why do you think they can put a tree in the back that can look the same, but not the rest of it. Proof is uncertain, I would say gives reason for suspicion.