I get your point. Realize what you're looking at, though. This is extremely extravagant fakery, then. For fakery, it sure is mundane and almost unpalatable, dry info. It doean't really hit a high "dupable" target audience for being so "thought out". And what is it's purpose?

Because the so-called information is there, the reasonable doubt is now on the other foot. Calling this fake doesn't make it fake. It must now be debunked.