I get your point. Realize what you're looking at, though. This is extremely extravagant fakery, then. For fakery, it sure is mundane and almost unpalatable, dry info. It doean't really hit a high "dupable" target audience for being so "thought out". And what is it's purpose?
Because the so-called information is there, the reasonable doubt is now on the other foot. Calling this fake doesn't make it fake. It must now be debunked.
Look at this first, then get back to us about being fooled.
https://archive.org/details/cym-corp-1/CYM%20Corp%201
I get your point. Realize what you're looking at, though. This is extremely extravagant fakery, then. For fakery, it sure is mundane and almost unpalatable, dry info. It doean't really hit a high "dupable" target audience for being so "thought out". And what is it's purpose?
Because the so-called information is there, the reasonable doubt is now on the other foot. Calling this fake doesn't make it fake. It must now be debunked.