I suggest watching the whole video. There's a few there that are a stretch for me too, but I couldn't rule them all out. If that doesn't do it for you, I have nothing to add. There's an inherent part of this that requires faith.
For me, that video proves Q and Trump are linked and operating on the same playbook. The rest (again, for me) is faith in Trump.
My red pill moment was a mundane event. It was when the MSM made Trump seem like he was disrespectful to PM Abe and all of Japan when he dumped food into the koi pond instead of giving food in small portions, leaving out the "small" detail that the PM did it first and Trump followed suit. This was in early 2017 if I remember right.
At that point I started to believe that the MSM is likely lying to me at every turn, and the events of the following 4 years basically kept proving that belief right. Now, MSM hates Q. Trump and Q are clearly intertwined. Trump's statements about Q (or lack thereof generally, except one in a press briefing) makes me think there actually is a plan. And I have full faith in Trump because all his policies are in my best interest (the American citizen), are contrary to every politician we've had in this country for far too long, are vehemently opposed by the MSM and radical left, and he's generally kept all his promises given the fact he can only do so much while in constant odds with Congress and the courts.
I don't feel the path is dangerous. I don't think because it requires faith it has to be dangerous, otherwise there's a lot of dangerous things in life because a lot of things require some iota of faith, at the very least. And even if you think they are dangerous, do you avoid all the risk because it could be dangerous? It just ends up in a sheltered life, afraid of ever being hurt in any way.
Personally, I won't be believing in this till I'm on my death bed. I have an end date that I won't share but think is generous. So it's either the events we expect to transpire actually do transpire or my faith runs out. To each their own, but I can assure you that if Q ends up being right, we'll all be better for it (except the pedos and globalists).
You can say the same thing about any religion then, but I don't see you trying to convince church-goers that God isn't real. I think some of the crusades weren't absolutely dangerous. And don't get me started on Islam, it makes the crusades look like kids playing in a sandbox.
Seems like you're here to convince us the folly of believing in something we choose to believe in. Instead of being here to learn why we believe it, as you claim.
My last post is as best as I can describe it, and I think it's perfectly logical. Some may disagree, but when faith is involved then leaps in logic are pretty much guaranteed. If that doesn't work for you, sorry then I can't help.
You need to look at it on your own, preferably in the context of the Trump candidacy, presidency and all of his actions because they are super important, and decide on your own. This discussion is equivalent to me trying to convince you God exists. No logical statements can be made without including faith in it. Otherwise it would never be a discussion about belief since God's existence would just be true. And this is coming from someone who doesn't believe in God too much but I understand if I want my mind changed, talking to other people won't do. It's self discovery.
I'll leave you with a food for thought. If there was some perfectly logical sequence of statements that can be articulated such that it convinces every single person with half a brain, then the whole thing can be understood by the very people the plan is meant to overthrow and therefore requires no faith from believers that there is indeed A) people meant to be overthrow and B) a plan to do it. You either believe it or you don't. And then you decide if you want to try to further test your existing belief or you decide you have it figured out completely and there's no reason to deviate.
"exposure to true information does not matter anymore. a person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information - the facts tell nothing to him. even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures, even if I take him by force...and show him concentration camps, he will refuse to believe it..."
logic does not protect one from brainwashing. faith communities, however, forge a protective layer against demoralization.
I suggest watching the whole video. There's a few there that are a stretch for me too, but I couldn't rule them all out. If that doesn't do it for you, I have nothing to add. There's an inherent part of this that requires faith.
For me, that video proves Q and Trump are linked and operating on the same playbook. The rest (again, for me) is faith in Trump.
my question to you, this might sound personal or rude but I'm not trying to be either of those things, are you a bot?
proof is a logical equation.
My red pill moment was a mundane event. It was when the MSM made Trump seem like he was disrespectful to PM Abe and all of Japan when he dumped food into the koi pond instead of giving food in small portions, leaving out the "small" detail that the PM did it first and Trump followed suit. This was in early 2017 if I remember right.
At that point I started to believe that the MSM is likely lying to me at every turn, and the events of the following 4 years basically kept proving that belief right. Now, MSM hates Q. Trump and Q are clearly intertwined. Trump's statements about Q (or lack thereof generally, except one in a press briefing) makes me think there actually is a plan. And I have full faith in Trump because all his policies are in my best interest (the American citizen), are contrary to every politician we've had in this country for far too long, are vehemently opposed by the MSM and radical left, and he's generally kept all his promises given the fact he can only do so much while in constant odds with Congress and the courts.
I don't feel the path is dangerous. I don't think because it requires faith it has to be dangerous, otherwise there's a lot of dangerous things in life because a lot of things require some iota of faith, at the very least. And even if you think they are dangerous, do you avoid all the risk because it could be dangerous? It just ends up in a sheltered life, afraid of ever being hurt in any way.
Personally, I won't be believing in this till I'm on my death bed. I have an end date that I won't share but think is generous. So it's either the events we expect to transpire actually do transpire or my faith runs out. To each their own, but I can assure you that if Q ends up being right, we'll all be better for it (except the pedos and globalists).
You can say the same thing about any religion then, but I don't see you trying to convince church-goers that God isn't real. I think some of the crusades weren't absolutely dangerous. And don't get me started on Islam, it makes the crusades look like kids playing in a sandbox.
Seems like you're here to convince us the folly of believing in something we choose to believe in. Instead of being here to learn why we believe it, as you claim.
My last post is as best as I can describe it, and I think it's perfectly logical. Some may disagree, but when faith is involved then leaps in logic are pretty much guaranteed. If that doesn't work for you, sorry then I can't help. You need to look at it on your own, preferably in the context of the Trump candidacy, presidency and all of his actions because they are super important, and decide on your own. This discussion is equivalent to me trying to convince you God exists. No logical statements can be made without including faith in it. Otherwise it would never be a discussion about belief since God's existence would just be true. And this is coming from someone who doesn't believe in God too much but I understand if I want my mind changed, talking to other people won't do. It's self discovery. I'll leave you with a food for thought. If there was some perfectly logical sequence of statements that can be articulated such that it convinces every single person with half a brain, then the whole thing can be understood by the very people the plan is meant to overthrow and therefore requires no faith from believers that there is indeed A) people meant to be overthrow and B) a plan to do it. You either believe it or you don't. And then you decide if you want to try to further test your existing belief or you decide you have it figured out completely and there's no reason to deviate.
Do YOU worry that if Q isn't true, then we are going down a dangerous path? Why or why not?
you have a logical view of how logical people cannot be manipulated. but you are wrong. here's a short segment where former Soviet propagandist Yuri Bezmenov explains the stages "ideological subversion." once a people are demoralized (stage 1):
logic does not protect one from brainwashing. faith communities, however, forge a protective layer against demoralization.
So in your view, every member of every religion in the world is dangerous?
What is your definition of "strong, indisputable evidence"?
Could something that is 100% true ever be disputed?
If something that is 100% true, yet disputed, now fall outside of your definition of "strong, indisputable evidence"?
Is it possible for something to be true, yet rejected by a majority of people? Is the truth malleable?
If you disagree with something, does that make it untrue?