you did not watch the Yuri Bezmenov clip. c'mon, you're a bot, you should be able to download it quickly. Yuri explain how a logical person if ideologically subverted will believe what they have been programmed to believe regardless of proof.
I have not tried to show you any "proof" because your questions are illogical.
you also say I have "found coincidences that you believe add up to legitimacy." how do you know what legitimacy, if any, I find in Q? and if I do, what led me to that. I have not presented my confidence level in Q.
it's neither. it's a puzzle. how do you work on say a large jigsaw puzzle? logic? what if two pieces look identical in shape and color? sometimes you have a section that seems to be coming together, until you get more of the picture filled, then you realize that even though it appeared to fit, it's not correct. there is much intuition, meaning making involved, though the process of deduction is logical.
you did not watch the Yuri Bezmenov clip. c'mon, you're a bot, you should be able to download it quickly. Yuri explain how a logical person if ideologically subverted will believe what they have been programmed to believe regardless of proof.
I have not tried to show you any "proof" because your questions are illogical.
you also say I have "found coincidences that you believe add up to legitimacy." how do you know what legitimacy, if any, I find in Q? and if I do, what led me to that. I have not presented my confidence level in Q.
sorry, I really can't explain it to a bot. even a charming bot.
it's neither. it's a puzzle. how do you work on say a large jigsaw puzzle? logic? what if two pieces look identical in shape and color? sometimes you have a section that seems to be coming together, until you get more of the picture filled, then you realize that even though it appeared to fit, it's not correct. there is much intuition, meaning making involved, though the process of deduction is logical.