The US transitioned from a Republic to a Corporation in 1871

posted 3 years ago by edman69 3 years ago by edman69 +8 / -1

We were a Corporation under the London City and Vatican Banking system(s) - “All roads lead to Rome.” This is WHY you see US Flags with gold fringe. Gold Fringe represents: “No Constitution,” “No Nation.” So, technically, we have always been under “Admiralty Law” or “Maritime Law.”

Because of this Corporation establishment, Trump was literally a CEO of the corporation for 4 years. He’s a mastermind businessman and because he knows his business(es), he knew how our financial system operated and was well-aware of how much debt we have always been (hence social security, taxes...etc.)

Therefore, he declared Bankruptcy (the United States Corporation) and filed for Chapter 11 with the London City and Vatican Banking system. THIS is why DC is now fenced off with mass amounts of fencing, barricades and military. The Military ceases all foreign assets and you can’t have a “President” (a sovereign leader) rule from foreign territory.

So, yes - we, technically, have a president running the US corporation BUT we are under governing law of the military - Hence, the military only taking orders from Trump (still) and the Pentagon putting restrictions to the Biden Admin.

Yes, there are a lot of details that need to be sorted out and yes, there will still be arrests made of treason and such. But ultimately, we will have an ENTIRE new admin; an admin under the REPUBLIC of Constitutional Law once things are sorted out and proven, Trump will be redecorated our President and

23 comments

23 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (23)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– antiapophenia 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Eric Madsen has been successful in court many, many times.

Could you please give me some citations for those cases. I can't find anything to the point on teamlaw.net. Thanks!

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– 427windsorman 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

You have his name, Eric Madsen, so you can do some research into his past cases. He lives in Colorado so that is where I would recommend you start your research. Try Denver County and Mesa County in Colorado. I would also check for state level courts in Colorado.

I don't have my old notes with case numbers. Those burned with my home in 2004.

Well you know more about it than me. So it's a little disappointing not to get any links from you, but OK your house burned down 16 years ago. Just to be clear I'm particularly interested in cases involving his (and others') claim that the 1871 Organic Act did more than change the structure of the government of D.C. Has he litigated any cases on that point? How many has he won?