Q is a classic example of human beings creating an unfalsifiable truth for themselves, which is why you see the goal posts constantly change. Goalpost changing is always the outcome where unfalsifiable truth is concerned.
The person establishes their conclusion first, and will then go searching for any amount of evidence to force fit into the narrative the conclusion creates. It's a case of putting the cart before the horse and is the polar opposite of the Scientific approach. This is why when Q claim they research, it actually makes a total mockery of the genuine research Scientists actually conduct.
Couldn't agree more. What is your take on the apparent split between Q and Proud Boys? Many Proud Boys are telling Trump to go f*%k himself, and there has been a bit of a Q exodus. Kudos to the Q supporter who have had enough and want out. That can't be easy, and I genuinely mean that. If you have invested so much time into doing what you do every day for something that isn't real, reality is going to be in the very least surreal. Surely Q can see Trump is not the knight in shining armour they were bolstering him up to be?
I never said I wasn't wrong. I am sure there are lots of things I am wrong about. I am saying that the Q conspiracies are so incredibly improbable you would have more of a chance winning the Euro Millions Lottery Jackpot than being on the money as a Qanon Conspiracy Theorist. We also have an overwhelming amount of evidence that Q predictions are never correct. Trump just threw a whole load of you under the bus for raiding Capitol Hill, and the very premise of the Q conspiracy was placed on this man's shoulders. You would want to be clinically insane to continue to believe all of this.
If you are right, then the vast majority of the world, and a whole host of completely different types of news channels around the world which make up the overwhelming majority are also wrong. It would also mean that a tiny minority of people globally speaking who generally keep tracks on Fox News (not so much anymore) Newsmaxx and OAN are the only ones who are correct.
Do you realise how improbable that is?
PS - It's a bit of a leap to say I put "all my effort" into trolling. You could never make that conclusion as you do not know me. Then again, Q are great at making devastatingly large leaps and assumptions to draw conclusions
Q is a classic example of human beings creating an unfalsifiable truth for themselves, which is why you see the goal posts constantly change. Goalpost changing is always the outcome where unfalsifiable truth is concerned.
The person establishes their conclusion first, and will then go searching for any amount of evidence to force fit into the narrative the conclusion creates. It's a case of putting the cart before the horse and is the polar opposite of the Scientific approach. This is why when Q claim they research, it actually makes a total mockery of the genuine research Scientists actually conduct.
Couldn't agree more. What is your take on the apparent split between Q and Proud Boys? Many Proud Boys are telling Trump to go f*%k himself, and there has been a bit of a Q exodus. Kudos to the Q supporter who have had enough and want out. That can't be easy, and I genuinely mean that. If you have invested so much time into doing what you do every day for something that isn't real, reality is going to be in the very least surreal. Surely Q can see Trump is not the knight in shining armour they were bolstering him up to be?
Basically, you're willing to put all your efforts into trolling, but not believe that you might be wrong.
I never said I wasn't wrong. I am sure there are lots of things I am wrong about. I am saying that the Q conspiracies are so incredibly improbable you would have more of a chance winning the Euro Millions Lottery Jackpot than being on the money as a Qanon Conspiracy Theorist. We also have an overwhelming amount of evidence that Q predictions are never correct. Trump just threw a whole load of you under the bus for raiding Capitol Hill, and the very premise of the Q conspiracy was placed on this man's shoulders. You would want to be clinically insane to continue to believe all of this.
If you are right, then the vast majority of the world, and a whole host of completely different types of news channels around the world which make up the overwhelming majority are also wrong. It would also mean that a tiny minority of people globally speaking who generally keep tracks on Fox News (not so much anymore) Newsmaxx and OAN are the only ones who are correct.
Do you realise how improbable that is?
PS - It's a bit of a leap to say I put "all my effort" into trolling. You could never make that conclusion as you do not know me. Then again, Q are great at making devastatingly large leaps and assumptions to draw conclusions
I'm imagining you saying this as Benedict Cumberbatch. You're a toff aren't you?
It would also mean that a tiny minority of people...are the only ones who are correct. Do you realise how improbable that is?
Not really, when you consider:
What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations?
What happens when those same corporations are operated and controlled by a political ideology?
Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name?
Forget to change your ID?