If the military is in control because the fraud is complete i.e. POTATUS inagurated (of America inc or not), and thus the military is actually running things than how is it that Christopher Miller is leaving? Wouldn't the head of the pentagon not leave explicitly (or military not allow changes they don't think beneficial) because there *is an illegitimate C.in Chief? Thoughts, please?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Optics.
Lol.
Everyone MAGA ever being put in prison.
"But why are we going to prison, daddy?"
"Optics. Don't worry, the military will free us all once it's clear they can stop the coup."
Would that make you happy? To have a government that would do that? Should it not be upsetting that your government DOES NOT have protecting your liberties in mind?
What is the purpose behind your sardonic comment?
What do you think?
Do you think the pilgrims would have made their journey if they just sat around and "trust the plan" (the Lord's)?
I don't know if Miller is really gone or not, but if he is, you may as well stick a fork in the plan.
Well, for one, I should hope that a plan decades in the making can't be foiled by the removal of 1 person. But, it does concern me...unless the plan was that they aniticapated Potatus' inauguration and thus the removal of patriots, and miller really just needed to go in a do something(s) that weren't contingent upon his educational placement.
But, I guess that is the whole optics argument.
Also, while nostalgia provoking, your example using the pilgrams and the plan isn't a good example in this situation.
Qs plan is not god's plan. Pilgrams obviously did trust god plan or America would not exist now. You conflate prayer with inaction. That conflation is a false dichotomy of either inaction via faith {pray/trust plan} or action {distrust existance of plan/every man for himself}. There is an entire universe of possibilities in between.