I keep reading content about ending the USA Corporation and reverting back to the United States of 1871.
Maybe someone can explain this better? Because it just seems like a red herring to me.
Even if whatever about it were true, what does reverting to the former really get us, more than a symbolic gesture? Back to a system of checks and balances with three branches of government elected by the states at their discretion?
That's what we had, corporation or not. And it failed because all branches were in bed with each other to serve themselves. Reverting would still prescribe government as we have it, would it not?
So what's the significance? Is there some hope that dissolving "the corporation" somehow invalidates the results of the fraud election? If so, how? And how does that work in practice?
There are various notions of (among other things):
These notions are mixed up into countless combinations with other sorts of... conspiracy theories?... whether such theories are oriented towards reality or not, or whether or not such orientation is in any way relevant, or whether or not reality itself is significant in the context of said theories. That is to say, notwithstanding the validity of these "theories", the conjunction of the theories with notions such as the three list above, diminishes the credence of the theories.
The motivations behind any of this have varied over the years, all the way back to the founding of the United States after 1776 (the first inklings of a "US Corporation" date to the time of the original constitution). The most recent significant motivations involve attempts to evade Income Tax and attempts to evade the Draft. Before that, motivations involved efforts to either accelerate or decelerate "Reconstruction" in the south, to sustain or revoke racist laws throughout the nation, etc. Important to note is that on many of the divisive issues between the Civil War and WWI, both sides appealed to the above notions (among others) in support of their side.
You can read the "Act of 1871" here: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf - and see that most of the claims made against and/or derived from it are non sequitur at best.
See also some of my rants about this on other threads.
My theory on all of this, is that someone shrewd has injected the "US Corporation" and "gold fringe flag" memes amongst us as red herring, knowing full well that anyone under the age of about 50 is extremely unlikely to have encountered these memes in the past.
It's more important to look at what these memes purport to demonstrate, to wit: the idea that a shadowy cabal secretly rules and owns us under the rubric of said "corporation". That's the "conspiracy theory" part. The cabal may indeed be real, and thus the theory may be more than a theory. If you accept the truth of the cabal, what is the point of the "corporation". There is no point. Such a cabal is going to rule and own the world just because they can. Laws, contracts, none of that matters if the cabal is real. The same applies if, say, extraterrestrial aliens rule the Earth: literally nothing else truly matters if that is the case.
I am torn as to whether or not the red herring is for us, or against us; whether it's a form of red pill, or blue pill.
Appreciate the comment. Never quite thought about if those 3 bullets you outlined even matter at all in the context of a cabal ruling the world.