It basically questions the intended main target audience for the Q drops. What if the ultimate target are the DS actors? Read the argumentation (a bit long but ... it is an interesting take).
I read it. Def think you’re off, but at first pass it doesn’t seem TOO shilly.
One thing I thought as I read it, is that if you were actually right, and DS ding dongs are watching this place, wouldn’t that a great post to delete?
If I were a mod and thought you were really onto something with that post, I would probably delete it.
But I’m not, and there has def been some sideways looking moves from them lately, so I dunno what to tell you. Have no idea what’s going in the bg with the mods.
Here is one post taken down 1 minute after posting it ... who knows how many others: https://greatawakening.win/p/11SJtHcmmO/an-interesting-viewpoint-on-q/
But what was the content. I don’t see it there.
Can you repeat it here or do you think that would make the mods disappear this thread also?
About an interesting twist on what Q aim might be. Original post is here: https://conspiracies.win/p/11SJtD622j/i-have-a-theory-and-i-think-its-/
It basically questions the intended main target audience for the Q drops. What if the ultimate target are the DS actors? Read the argumentation (a bit long but ... it is an interesting take).
A copy of the post on conspiracies.win:
I read it. Def think you’re off, but at first pass it doesn’t seem TOO shilly.
One thing I thought as I read it, is that if you were actually right, and DS ding dongs are watching this place, wouldn’t that a great post to delete?
If I were a mod and thought you were really onto something with that post, I would probably delete it.
But I’m not, and there has def been some sideways looking moves from them lately, so I dunno what to tell you. Have no idea what’s going in the bg with the mods.