The whole Joe body double thing got my curious about the signatures on his recent EOs. Compared to search results. Sure enough, they don't match at all. His signature hasn't changed in 50 years. The "B" does actually look like someone else, very very close to him.... - The Great Awakening

The whole Joe body double thing got my curious about the signatures on his recent EOs. Compared to search results. Sure enough, they don't match at all. His signature hasn't changed in 50 years. The "B" does actually look like someone else, very very close to him.... (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 3 years ago by SaltyFlorida 3 years ago by SaltyFlorida +376 / -1

77 comments download

77 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (77)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– LockedandLoaded 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

With Joe, the MSM had a much easier time convincing the sleeping masses that he received 80m votes. After all, he’s “middle class Joe”, a known commodity and somebody the public could see receiving a ton of support, even if WE know it’s all bullshit.

If they put Kamala as the head of the ticket and were forced to cheat just as much, if not more because Kamala couldn’t even get 1% in the primaries, the fraud would be absolutely undeniable to the sleeping masses. Kamala is their girl, but the ONLY way to get her in is by attaching her to a known political commodity like Joe. There is no way they could spin their way into convincing the mass public that Kamala received the 80m votes required to “beat” Trump.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q