Nah, I'm a lawyer; I'm reacting to an utterly nonsensical claim. Claiming that the United States has trustees is like claiming that you have trustees; it's not cognizable.
Do you have any evidence these trustees exist? Can you direct me to something in the Congressional Record establishing them? After all, were they to exist, they'd either be mentioned in the Constitution, or in the Congressional Record.
I'm entirely uninterested in doxxing myself, particularly on this website. I notice you ignored this part of my post:
Do you have any evidence these trustees exist? Can you direct me to something in the Congressional Record establishing them? After all, were they to exist, they'd either be mentioned in the Constitution, or in the Congressional Record.
Go on. After all, it should be incredibly easy for you to prove that these trustees exist if they in fact do. You presumably believe this on the basis of some actual evidence, right?
No, I don't want you to take my word for it - I want you to interrogate the evidence. Why won't you answer these questions?
Do you have any evidence these trustees exist? Can you direct me to something in the Congressional Record establishing them? After all, were they to exist, they'd either be mentioned in the Constitution, or in the Congressional Record.
Since you're so concerned with proof, you presumably have proof that these trustees exist, right?
Nah, I'm a lawyer; I'm reacting to an utterly nonsensical claim. Claiming that the United States has trustees is like claiming that you have trustees; it's not cognizable.
Do you have any evidence these trustees exist? Can you direct me to something in the Congressional Record establishing them? After all, were they to exist, they'd either be mentioned in the Constitution, or in the Congressional Record.
Go on.
I'm entirely uninterested in doxxing myself, particularly on this website. I notice you ignored this part of my post:
Go on. After all, it should be incredibly easy for you to prove that these trustees exist if they in fact do. You presumably believe this on the basis of some actual evidence, right?
No, I don't want you to take my word for it - I want you to interrogate the evidence. Why won't you answer these questions?
Since you're so concerned with proof, you presumably have proof that these trustees exist, right?