From no evidence of voter fraud to not enough to overturn the election
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (10)
sorted by:
Keep your eyes on Rand. He will, most likely, play a key role in the weeks and months ahead with regards to election integrity and all of this voter fraud. One of only a handful in Congress that are worth something. Some will say "ahhh but why did he vote to certify?? he's a traitor.."
Stay tuned. This thing isn't over yet.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2017/10/12/National-Politics/Images/Botsford171012Trump20816.JPG
I think that, like Pence, White Hats might have been instructed/encouraged Rand to be brave enough "to do the wrong thing" (paraphrasing Trump's 1.6 speech).
Had he not voted to certify I guess it's unlikely ABC would have invited him to do an interview like this, which has allowed him to drop some red-pills and keep the voter fraud narrative alive. I mean, I don't think they're inviting Cruz for interviews like this are they?
good point.
I love that argument " not enough to change the outcome " . How does anyone know that?
Because [they] said so.
They were saying that two weeks after the election.
They cannot counter any one of the actual fraud evidence they just resort to all the court cases thrown out and AG Barr statement and state certification. So shallow yet their minions eat it up and regurgitate it.
hey , liddle georgie, if there were plenty of investigations, lets get the names of these investigators and ask them about these investigations. lets see the endless list of responsible investigators that looked into election fraud and irregularities. as a "journalist", dont you owe it to the people you are trying to convince that this story of yours is true? I mean, did you not believe in the Russia hoax? and hwat became of that?
yeah, this weasel wont ever see this comment, but this should be the response to these traitors.or at least something similar